issue_comments: 869074701

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1384#issuecomment-869074701 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1384 869074701 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg2OTA3NDcwMQ== 2670795 2021-06-26T23:45:18Z 2021-06-26T23:45:37Z CONTRIBUTOR

Here's where the plugin hook is called, demonstrating the fallback= argument:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/05a312caf3debb51aa1069939923a49e21cd2bd1/datasette/app.py#L426-L472

I'm not convinced of the use-case for passing fallback= to the hook here - is there a reason a plugin might care whether fallback is True or False, seeing as the metadata() method already respects that fallback logic on line 459?

I think you're right. I can't think of a reason why the plugin would care about the fallback parameter since plugins are currently mandated to return a full, global metadata dict.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 930807135