issue_comments: 996046304

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996046304 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 996046304 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnXg 9599 2021-12-16T17:53:40Z 2021-12-16T18:16:12Z OWNER

I'm also not convinced that this configuration syntax is right. It's a bit weird having a "facets" list that can either by column-name-strings or {"type-of-facet": "column-name"} objects. Maybe there's a better design for this?

Part of the problem here is that facets were designed to accept optional extra configuration - partly to support m2m facets in #495 - but I haven't actually shipped any facets that use that ability.

Facet by delimiter would be a good one to exercise that ability: - #510

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 1078702875