issue_comments
32 rows where issue = 1217759117 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1111390433 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1727#issuecomment-1111390433 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1727 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CPnjh | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-27T19:21:02Z | 2022-04-27T19:21:02Z | OWNER | One weird thing: I noticed that in the parallel trace above the SQL query bars are wider. Mousover shows duration in ms, and I got 13ms for this query:
But in the Given those numbers though I would expect the overall page time to be MUCH worse for the parallel version - but the page load times are instead very close to each other, with parallel often winning. This is super-weird. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Research: demonstrate if parallel SQL queries are worthwhile 1217759117 | |
1111385875 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1727#issuecomment-1111385875 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1727 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CPmcT | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-27T19:16:57Z | 2022-04-27T19:16:57Z | OWNER | I just remembered the Would explain why the first trace never seems to show more than three SQL queries executing at once. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Research: demonstrate if parallel SQL queries are worthwhile 1217759117 | |
1111380282 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1727#issuecomment-1111380282 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1727 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CPlE6 | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-27T19:10:27Z | 2022-04-27T19:10:27Z | OWNER | Wrote more about that here: https://simonwillison.net/2022/Apr/27/parallel-queries/ Compare https://latest-with-plugins.datasette.io/github/commits?_facet=repo&_facet=committer&_trace=1 With the same thing but with parallel execution disabled: Those total page load time numbers are very similar. Is this parallel optimization worthwhile? Maybe it's only worth it on larger databases? Or maybe larger databases perform worse with this? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Research: demonstrate if parallel SQL queries are worthwhile 1217759117 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1