issue_comments
6 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2022-04-25 and user = 9599 sorted by node_id
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date)
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id ▼ | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1108875068 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1715#issuecomment-1108875068 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1715 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CGBc8 | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-25T18:03:13Z | 2022-04-25T18:06:33Z | OWNER | The I'm going to split the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView to use asyncinject 1212823665 | |
1108877454 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1715#issuecomment-1108877454 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1715 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CGCCO | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-25T18:04:27Z | 2022-04-25T18:04:27Z | OWNER | Pushed my WIP on this to the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView to use asyncinject 1212823665 | |
1108884171 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1719#issuecomment-1108884171 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1719 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CGDrL | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-25T18:10:46Z | 2022-04-25T18:12:45Z | OWNER | It looks like the only class method from that shared class needed by Which I've been wanting to refactor to provide to
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor `RowView` and remove `RowTableShared` 1214859703 | |
1108888494 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1719#issuecomment-1108888494 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1719 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CGEuu | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-25T18:15:42Z | 2022-04-25T18:15:42Z | OWNER | Here's an undocumented feature I forgot existed: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/simple_primary_key/1.json?_extras=foreign_key_tables
It's even covered by the tests: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor `RowView` and remove `RowTableShared` 1214859703 | |
1108890170 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/262#issuecomment-1108890170 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/262 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CGFI6 | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-25T18:17:09Z | 2022-04-25T18:18:39Z | OWNER | I spotted in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1719#issuecomment-1108888494 that there's actually already an undocumented implementation of I added that feature all the way back in November 2017! https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/a30c5b220c15360d575e94b0e67f3255e120b916 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add ?_extra= mechanism for requesting extra properties in JSON 323658641 | |
1108907238 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1719#issuecomment-1108907238 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1719 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CGJTm | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-25T18:34:21Z | 2022-04-25T18:34:21Z | OWNER | Well this refactor turned out to be pretty quick and really does greatly simplify both the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor `RowView` and remove `RowTableShared` 1214859703 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3