issue_comments
10,495 rows sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
user 248
- simonw 5,613
- codecov[bot] 107
- russss 39
- psychemedia 27
- abdusco 26
- aborruso 19
- mroswell 18
- chrismp 18
- jacobian 14
- carlmjohnson 14
- RhetTbull 14
- tballison 13
- tsibley 11
- rixx 11
- terrycojones 10
- stonebig 10
- eyeseast 9
- clausjuhl 9
- bobwhitelock 9
- maxhawkins 8
- UtahDave 8
- tomchristie 8
- brandonrobertz 8
- bsilverm 8
- dracos 7
- rgieseke 7
- mhalle 7
- zeluspudding 7
- cobiadigital 7
- frafra 6
- amjith 6
- simonwiles 6
- wragge 6
- rayvoelker 6
- khimaros 5
- jaywgraves 5
- MarkusH 5
- fgregg 5
- dazzag24 5
- SteadBytes 5
- dependabot-preview[bot] 5
- jayvdb 4
- jefftriplett 4
- ctb 4
- r4vi 4
- zaneselvans 4
- jungle-boogie 4
- ColinMaudry 4
- kbaikov 4
- JBPressac 4
- nitinpaultifr 4
- henry501 4
- dependabot[bot] 4
- benpickles 3
- frankieroberto 3
- bollwyvl 3
- obra 3
- janimo 3
- atomotic 3
- ghing 3
- pkoppstein 3
- yozlet 3
- Btibert3 3
- yschimke 3
- philroche 3
- macropin 3
- camallen 3
- wsxiaoys 3
- lovasoa 3
- jsfenfen 3
- xrotwang 3
- robroc 3
- dufferzafar 3
- ashishdotme 3
- Kabouik 3
- blairdrummond 3
- jsancho-gpl 3
- kevindkeogh 3
- daniel-butler 3
- FabianHertwig 3
- polyrand 3
- pjamargh 3
- garethr 2
- danp 2
- ftrain 2
- 20after4 2
- chrishas35 2
- ingenieroariel 2
- coleifer 2
- gavinband 2
- aviflax 2
- tholo 2
- cldellow 2
- frankier 2
- tmaier 2
- gfrmin 2
- frosencrantz 2
- eads 2
- leafgarland 2
- glasnt 2
- Mjboothaus 2
- n8henrie 2
- soobrosa 2
- nathancahill 2
- betatim 2
- bsmithgall 2
- Florents-Tselai 2
- willingc 2
- nattaylor 2
- durkie 2
- raynae 2
- wulfmann 2
- philshem 2
- bram2000 2
- zzeleznick 2
- nickvazz 2
- aaronyih1 2
- jussiarpalahti 2
- lagolucas 2
- chekos 2
- ad-si 2
- smithdc1 2
- gsajko 2
- null92 2
- rachelmarconi 2
- tunguyenatwork 2
- LVerneyPEReN 2
- anotherjesse 1
- jarib 1
- jokull 1
- dsisnero 1
- gijs 1
- gravis 1
- nkirsch 1
- tomdyson 1
- dkam 1
- furilo 1
- fs111 1
- adamwolf 1
- prabhur 1
- dmd 1
- rubenv 1
- Uninen 1
- carsonyl 1
- nryberg 1
- step21 1
- stefanocudini 1
- rcoup 1
- hpk42 1
- annapowellsmith 1
- aslakr 1
- thorn0 1
- yurivish 1
- jmelloy 1
- Krazybug 1
- dvhthomas 1
- sethvincent 1
- meatcar 1
- aitoehigie 1
- michaelmcandrew 1
- drewda 1
- stiles 1
- saulpw 1
- thadk 1
- robintw 1
- ipmb 1
- mikepqr 1
- 0x1997 1
- davidszotten 1
- kevboh 1
- eaubin 1
- yunzheng 1
- heyarne 1
- simonrjones 1
- mcint 1
- justinpinkney 1
- merwok 1
- virtadpt 1
- snth 1
- joshmgrant 1
- bcongdon 1
- nickdirienzo 1
- adamjonas 1
- hannseman 1
- kaihendry 1
- brimstone 1
- adamchainz 1
- PabloLerma 1
- heussd 1
- RayBB 1
- limar 1
- drkane 1
- Gagravarr 1
- ligurio 1
- dyllan-to-you 1
- justinallen 1
- wdccdw 1
- progpow 1
- ltrgoddard 1
- costrouc 1
- jratike80 1
- ccorcos 1
- qqilihq 1
- QAInsights 1
- secretGeek 1
- fkuhn 1
- jameslittle230 1
- dskrad 1
- kwladyka 1
- Carib0u 1
- fatihky 1
- phoenixjun 1
- JesperTreetop 1
- bapowell 1
- louispotok 1
- chris48s 1
- plpxsk 1
- ChristopherWilks 1
- Maltazar 1
- eumiro 1
- wuhland 1
- foscoj 1
- dvot197007 1
- kokes 1
- rprimet 1
- metab0t 1
- spdkils 1
- sturzl 1
- robmarkcole 1
- jfeiwell 1
- coisnepe 1
- chmaynard 1
- noklam 1
- GmGniap 1
- rdtq 1
- LucasElArruda 1
- duarteocarmo 1
- mattiaborsoi 1
- sarcasticadmin 1
- abeyerpath 1
- b0b5h4rp13 1
- patricktrainer 1
- justmars 1
- jcmkk3 1
- publicmatt 1
- thisismyfuckingusername 1
- MichaelTiemannOSC 1
- kirajano 1
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
960420237 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1495#issuecomment-960420237 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1495 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c45PtmN | mroswell 192568 | 2021-11-04T03:12:01Z | 2021-11-04T03:12:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This all looks promising! I will need detailed documentation on how to upgrade datasette once it's available, and how to implement. (@fgregg example looks very straightforward on the plugin front.) I'll be so excited if I can get: https://list.saferdisinfectants.org/ instead of https://list.saferdisinfectants.org/disinfectants/listN |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow routes to have extra options 1033678984 | |
960295228 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/239#issuecomment-960295228 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/239 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM45PPE8 | tmaier 350038 | 2021-11-03T23:35:37Z | 2021-11-03T23:36:50Z | NONE | I think I only wonder how I would parse the JSON My naive approach would have been |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sqlite-utils extract could handle nested objects 816526538 | |
960292442 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/239#issuecomment-960292442 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/239 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM45POZa | tmaier 350038 | 2021-11-03T23:28:55Z | 2021-11-03T23:28:55Z | NONE | I am super interested in this feature. After reading the other issues you referenced, I think the right way would be to use the current extract feature and then to use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sqlite-utils extract could handle nested objects 816526538 | |
956225475 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1500#issuecomment-956225475 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1500 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44_tfD | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2021-11-01T13:16:36Z | 2021-11-01T13:16:36Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #1500 +/-=======================================
Coverage 91.82% 91.82% Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Bump black from 21.9b0 to 21.10b0 1041158024 | |
956041692 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/173#issuecomment-956041692 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/173 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM44_Anc | Florents-Tselai 2118708 | 2021-11-01T08:42:24Z | 2021-11-01T08:42:24Z | NONE |
I was thinking about this, while inserting a stream of ~40M line-delimited json docs. Wouldn't a That's how tqdm does it |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Progress bar for sqlite-utils insert 707478649 | |
955384545 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1253#issuecomment-955384545 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1253 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c448gLh | dufferzafar 1449512 | 2021-10-30T16:00:42Z | 2021-10-30T16:00:42Z | NONE | Yeah, I was pressing Ctrl + Enter as well. Came here to open this issue and found out Shift + Enter works. @simonw Any way to configure this? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Capture "Ctrl + Enter" or "⌘ + Enter" to send SQL query? 826064552 | |
955370190 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/206#issuecomment-955370190 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/206 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM448crO | dufferzafar 1449512 | 2021-10-30T15:52:16Z | 2021-10-30T15:52:16Z | NONE | @simonw That was working fine. It turned out that I had to use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sqlite-utils should suggest --csv if JSON parsing fails 761915790 | |
955367409 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/206#issuecomment-955367409 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/206 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM448b_x | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-30T15:50:39Z | 2021-10-30T15:50:39Z | OWNER | What's the error message? Sometimes I pipe JSON through
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sqlite-utils should suggest --csv if JSON parsing fails 761915790 | |
955365098 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/206#issuecomment-955365098 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/206 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM448bbq | dufferzafar 1449512 | 2021-10-30T15:49:19Z | 2021-10-30T15:49:19Z | NONE | @simonw Hey! JSON parsing for me is failing and I'm getting this same error, but I feel that my json is correct. How can I debug this? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sqlite-utils should suggest --csv if JSON parsing fails 761915790 | |
954384496 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1495#issuecomment-954384496 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1495 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c444sBw | fgregg 536941 | 2021-10-29T03:07:13Z | 2021-10-29T03:07:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | okay @simonw, made the requested changes. tests are running locally. i think this is ready for you to look at again. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow routes to have extra options 1033678984 | |
954303095 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/248#issuecomment-954303095 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/248 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM444YJ3 | Florents-Tselai 2118708 | 2021-10-28T23:46:47Z | 2021-10-28T23:46:47Z | NONE | @mhalle maybe you can try out #333 ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
support for Apache Arrow / parquet files I/O 836829560 | |
953911245 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/242#issuecomment-953911245 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/242 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4424fN | eyeseast 25778 | 2021-10-28T14:37:55Z | 2021-10-28T14:37:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've been thinking about this a bit lately, doing a project that involves moving a lot of data in and out of SQLite files, datasette and GeoJSON. This has me leaning toward the idea that something like I know there's a lot of overlap in sqlite-utils and datasette, and maybe keeping sqlite-utils synchronous would let datasette be entirely async and give a cleaner separation of implementations. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Async support 817989436 | |
953508979 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-953508979 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c441WRz | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-28T05:13:49Z | 2021-10-28T05:13:49Z | OWNER | Wrote about this in my weeknotes: https://simonwillison.net/2021/Oct/28/weeknotes-kubernetes-web-components/ |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
953366110 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1380#issuecomment-953366110 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1380 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c440zZe | glasnt 813732 | 2021-10-27T22:48:55Z | 2021-10-27T22:48:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | It looks like if the files argument is a directory, I tried seeing if I could get
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Serve all db files in a folder 924748955 | |
953334718 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1380#issuecomment-953334718 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1380 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c440ru- | glasnt 813732 | 2021-10-27T21:45:04Z | 2021-10-27T21:45:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I am also getting this issue, using the currently most recent version of datasette
If I run
Adding new files while datasette is running shows no new files, and removing files causes datasette to return 500 errors.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Serve all db files in a folder 924748955 | |
951740637 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/878#issuecomment-951740637 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/878 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44umjd | 20after4 30934 | 2021-10-26T09:12:15Z | 2021-10-26T09:12:15Z | NONE | This sounds really ambitious but also really awesome. I like the idea that basically any piece of a page could be selectively replaced. It sort of sounds like a python asyncio version of https://github.com/observablehq/runtime |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New pattern for views that return either JSON or HTML, available for plugins 648435885 | |
951731255 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1204#issuecomment-951731255 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1204 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44ukQ3 | 20after4 30934 | 2021-10-26T09:01:28Z | 2021-10-26T09:01:28Z | NONE |
Why not return a data structure instead of just a template name? I've already done some custom hacking to modify datasette but the plugin mechanism you are building here would be much cleaner than what I've built. I'd be happy to help with testing this PR and fleshing it out further if you are still considering merging this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: Plugin includes 793002853 | |
950417375 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950417375 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pjff | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:36:54Z | 2021-10-24T23:36:54Z | OWNER | Tried fixing this by pushing a new |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950416802 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950416802 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pjWi | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:32:39Z | 2021-10-24T23:32:39Z | OWNER | That's because the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950416682 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950416682 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pjUq | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:31:51Z | 2021-10-24T23:31:51Z | OWNER | One catch: the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950416659 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950416659 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pjUT | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:31:41Z | 2021-10-24T23:31:41Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | ||
950416460 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950416460 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pjRM | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:30:10Z | 2021-10-24T23:30:10Z | OWNER | Testing that newly published image:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950416061 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950416061 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pjK9 | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:27:18Z | 2021-10-24T23:27:18Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | ||
950415822 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950415822 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pjHO | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:25:45Z | 2021-10-24T23:25:45Z | OWNER | I'm going to attempt to publish |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950415129 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950415129 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pi8Z | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:21:33Z | 2021-10-24T23:21:33Z | OWNER | That fixed it! Resulting image is 249MB which is a very slight size reduction (I think previous was 259MB (uncompressed). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950413185 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950413185 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pieB | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:16:25Z | 2021-10-24T23:18:30Z | OWNER | Debian stable these days is "bullseye" - https://www.debian.org/releases/ - which has the version of SpatiaLite that I was previously pulling in from Sid: https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/libsqlite3-mod-spatialite So upgrading to the 3.9.7-slim-bullseye base image may help. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950412628 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950412628 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44piVU | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:13:20Z | 2021-10-24T23:13:27Z | OWNER | I think the root cause here is that I'm using a Debian Buster base image and then installing SpatiaLite from Debian unstable (sid) - as described in this comment: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1249#issuecomment-804309510 That's has worked fine in the past, but Sid is unstable - and this seems to be one of those instabilities. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950411417 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950411417 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44piCZ | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:06:45Z | 2021-10-24T23:11:14Z | OWNER | Same errors with 5 41.46 /usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory5 41.46 dpkg: error processing package libc6:amd64 (--configure):5 41.46 installed libc6:amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1275 41.47 Errors were encountered while processing:5 41.47 libc6:amd645 41.50 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950411912 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950411912 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44piKI | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:09:41Z | 2021-10-24T23:09:41Z | OWNER | Here that is in the Debian bug tracker: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993755 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950411808 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950411808 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44piIg | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:08:59Z | 2021-10-24T23:08:59Z | OWNER | Looks like it's this bug, reported on the Debian mailing list: https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1818037.html No obvious workaround there though. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950411320 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950411320 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44piA4 | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:06:05Z | 2021-10-24T23:06:05Z | OWNER | Right now the base image is: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e6e44372b34414eac2f36a4c1120af4f755aa423/Dockerfile#L1 I'm going to try |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950410718 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950410718 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44ph3e | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:02:30Z | 2021-10-24T23:02:30Z | OWNER | I got the same error publishing 0.59: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/1343251945 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
950410554 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1497#issuecomment-950410554 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44ph06 | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T23:01:20Z | 2021-10-24T23:01:28Z | OWNER | I can replicate locally by running:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" 1034535001 | |
938141121 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-938141121 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c436uXB | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2021-10-07T20:42:37Z | 2021-10-24T22:19:28Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #1481 +/-==========================================
- Coverage 91.83% 91.82% -0.02% | Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| datasette/app.py | Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
950403692 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1495#issuecomment-950403692 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1495 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pgJs | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T22:10:43Z | 2021-10-24T22:10:43Z | OWNER | To land this change we'll need a unit test that demonstrates the new capability - I suggest putting that next to this test: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/15a9d4abfff0c45dee2a9f851326e1d61b1c678c/tests/test_plugins.py#L648-L659 It will also need documentation, which should be added here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/15a9d4abfff0c45dee2a9f851326e1d61b1c678c/docs/plugin_hooks.rst#register-routes-datasette |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow routes to have extra options 1033678984 | |
950403521 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1495#issuecomment-950403521 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1495 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pgHB | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T22:09:18Z | 2021-10-24T22:09:18Z | OWNER | This is a great idea - I've wanted this myself before, but never spent any time thinking about how to achieve it. I think your design here is exactly right - an optional third item in the tuple consisting of a dictionary of options to pass to the view function. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow routes to have extra options 1033678984 | |
950402273 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1482#issuecomment-950402273 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1482 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44pfzh | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-24T22:00:29Z | 2021-10-24T22:00:29Z | OWNER | Janus 0.6.2 is out now and should have the fix. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support Python 3.10 1021550542 | |
950150483 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1401#issuecomment-950150483 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1401 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44oiVT | jaywgraves 418191 | 2021-10-23T13:09:10Z | 2021-10-23T13:09:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think it's because of this in
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blame/main/datasette/static/app.css#L35-L38 You could probably reinstate that by providing your own CSS. https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.24/custom_templates.html#custom-css-and-javascript |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
unordered list is not rendering bullet points in description_html on database page 950664971 | |
949912718 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1496#issuecomment-949912718 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1496 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44noSO | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-22T19:38:23Z | 2021-10-22T19:38:23Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Named parameters docs should include an example of a cast 1033864602 | ||
949604763 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1284#issuecomment-949604763 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1284 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44mdGb | fgregg 536941 | 2021-10-22T12:54:34Z | 2021-10-22T12:54:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i'm going to take a swing at this today. we'll see. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature or Documentation Request: Individual table as home page template 845794436 | |
947203725 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-947203725 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44dS6N | ghing 110420 | 2021-10-20T00:21:54Z | 2021-10-20T00:21:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This StackOverflow post, sqlite - Cloud Run: Why does my instance need so much RAM?, points to this section of the Cloud Run docs that says:
Does datasette write any large files when starting? Or does the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
947196177 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-947196177 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44dRER | ghing 110420 | 2021-10-20T00:05:10Z | 2021-10-20T00:05:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I was looking through the Dockerfile-generation code to see if there was anything that would cause memory usage to be a lot during deployment. I noticed that the Dockerfile runs Or would that come into play when running |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
946493045 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/942#issuecomment-946493045 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/942 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44alZ1 | kokes 8451755 | 2021-10-19T08:42:39Z | 2021-10-19T08:42:39Z | NONE | @simonw I know this is closed, just found this via the annotated release notes, but I wanted to note this one thing: Not sure how widely used this is, but I've seen CSVW a couple times in the wild. It is trying to address these metadata challenges in a standardised way. See e.g. - https://www.w3.org/TR/tabular-data-primer/#h-documentation-columns - https://w3c.github.io/csvw/tests/ I'm not suggesting you change the syntax you've implemented, just letting you know of this effort by W3C. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support column descriptions in metadata.json 681334912 | |
946467547 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1396#issuecomment-946467547 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1396 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44afLb | MichaelTiemannOSC 72577720 | 2021-10-19T08:10:26Z | 2021-10-19T08:10:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Now that 0.59 has excellent annotated release notes, you can re-confirm this is fixed by updating the published Docker image and checking that these fixes still work ;-) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
"invalid reference format" publishing Docker image 944903881 | |
946360891 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1493#issuecomment-946360891 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1493 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44aFI7 | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-19T04:37:27Z | 2021-10-19T04:37:27Z | OWNER | I renamed But... in 0.59 I stopped following HTTP redirects by default, which is why this used to work and no longer does! So the fix is to update the Homebrew regression test to use this instead:
Thanks for catching this! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`--get '/:memory:.json?sql=select+3*5'` error with datasette 0.59 1028115674 | |
946287922 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1432#issuecomment-946287922 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1432 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44ZzUy | mroswell 192568 | 2021-10-19T01:16:41Z | 2021-10-19T01:16:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Resolved, with assistance from @ashishdotme (Thank you!) Updated requirements.txt to include:
Ran:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rename Datasette.__init__(config=) parameter to settings= 969855774 | |
946255239 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1432#issuecomment-946255239 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1432 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44ZrWH | mroswell 192568 | 2021-10-18T23:55:25Z | 2021-10-18T23:55:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I am getting this when I visit my live Datasette page:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rename Datasette.__init__(config=) parameter to settings= 969855774 | |
946097058 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1470#issuecomment-946097058 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1470 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44ZEui | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-18T19:30:15Z | 2021-10-18T19:30:15Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
?_sort=rowid with _next= returns error 995098231 | ||
945763015 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1494#issuecomment-945763015 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1494 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44XzLH | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2021-10-18T13:22:56Z | 2021-10-18T13:22:56Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #1494 +/-=======================================
Coverage 91.82% 91.82% Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update pytest-asyncio requirement from <0.16,>=0.10 to >=0.10,<0.17 1029100823 | |
945639639 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1432#issuecomment-945639639 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1432 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44XVDX | ashishdotme 5802411 | 2021-10-18T10:44:56Z | 2021-10-18T10:44:56Z | NONE | @simonw I am getting the below issue again now, even after removing branch argument from vercel datasette plugin module initialization error: init() got an unexpected keyword argument 'config' module initialization error init() got an unexpected keyword argument 'config' |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rename Datasette.__init__(config=) parameter to settings= 969855774 | |
945037884 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1467#issuecomment-945037884 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1467 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44VCI8 | jameslittle230 3058200 | 2021-10-17T02:29:06Z | 2021-10-17T02:29:06Z | NONE | Yay! Thank you @simonw!! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add Authorization header when CORS flag is set 991575770 | |
945020210 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-945020210 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44U90y | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-16T23:19:51Z | 2021-10-16T23:19:51Z | OWNER | Since that Janus PR hasn't been merged yet, one temporary option for a fix would be to entirely vendor the fixed Janus - https://github.com/aio-libs/janus/blob/9e13d3fb74e2c93d7501443b370a455d1b302b1f/janus/init.py - since it's only a single module. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
944986367 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-944986367 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44U1j_ | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-16T19:07:38Z | 2021-10-16T19:09:02Z | OWNER | This is blocking an upgrade for the Homebrew Datasette package: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/86932 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
944918759 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/310#issuecomment-944918759 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/310 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM44UlDn | rdtq 22523840 | 2021-10-16T13:54:56Z | 2021-10-16T13:54:56Z | NONE | It would be cool if --flatten worked with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`sqlite-utils insert --flatten` option to flatten nested JSON 964400482 | |
943632697 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1467#issuecomment-943632697 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1467 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44PrE5 | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-14T18:54:18Z | 2021-10-14T18:54:18Z | OWNER | The test there failed because it turns out there's a whole bunch of places that set the |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add Authorization header when CORS flag is set 991575770 | |
943623246 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1467#issuecomment-943623246 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1467 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44PoxO | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-14T18:42:19Z | 2021-10-14T18:42:19Z | OWNER | This looks like a good fix to me. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add Authorization header when CORS flag is set 991575770 | |
943620649 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1458#issuecomment-943620649 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1458 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44PoIp | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-14T18:38:58Z | 2021-10-14T18:38:58Z | OWNER | This is a great idea, thanks. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rework the `--static` documentation a bit 988555009 | |
943594738 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1489#issuecomment-943594738 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1489 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44Phzy | dependabot[bot] 49699333 | 2021-10-14T18:04:13Z | 2021-10-14T18:04:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update pyyaml requirement from ~=5.3 to >=5.3,<7.0 1026379132 | |
943594735 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1489#issuecomment-943594735 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1489 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44Phzv | dependabot[bot] 49699333 | 2021-10-14T18:04:12Z | 2021-10-14T18:04:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Looks like this PR is closed. If you re-open it I'll rebase it as long as no-one else has edited it (you can use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update pyyaml requirement from ~=5.3 to >=5.3,<7.0 1026379132 | |
943594712 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1489#issuecomment-943594712 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1489 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44PhzY | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-14T18:04:11Z | 2021-10-14T18:04:11Z | OWNER | @dependabot recreate |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update pyyaml requirement from ~=5.3 to >=5.3,<7.0 1026379132 | |
942782673 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1488#issuecomment-942782673 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1488 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44MbjR | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-13T23:04:54Z | 2021-10-13T23:04:54Z | OWNER | I think this is the change in Previously it was using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to httpx 0.20.0 (request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'allow_redirects') 1025754125 | |
942779926 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1488#issuecomment-942779926 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1488 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44Ma4W | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-13T22:59:05Z | 2021-10-13T22:59:05Z | OWNER | This is weird - as far as I can tell |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to httpx 0.20.0 (request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'allow_redirects') 1025754125 | |
942778673 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1488#issuecomment-942778673 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1488 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44Makx | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-13T22:55:44Z | 2021-10-13T22:55:44Z | OWNER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to httpx 0.20.0 (request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'allow_redirects') 1025754125 | |
942778382 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1488#issuecomment-942778382 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1488 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44MagO | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-13T22:55:01Z | 2021-10-13T22:55:01Z | OWNER | I think the issue is in
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to httpx 0.20.0 (request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'allow_redirects') 1025754125 | |
942777414 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1488#issuecomment-942777414 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1488 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44MaRG | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-13T22:52:40Z | 2021-10-13T22:52:40Z | OWNER | Upgrading to 0.20.0 gives me lots of the following errors:
It looks like the full query string is now being treated as the name of the database. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to httpx 0.20.0 (request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'allow_redirects') 1025754125 | |
942752844 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/330#issuecomment-942752844 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/330 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM44MURM | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2021-10-13T22:00:31Z | 2021-10-13T22:11:30Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #330 +/-=======================================
Coverage 96.59% 96.59% Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test against Python 3.10 1025726600 | |
915229323 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1463#issuecomment-915229323 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1463 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c42jUqL | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2021-09-08T13:15:26Z | 2021-10-13T21:52:23Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #1463 +/-==========================================
- Coverage 91.83% 91.83% -0.01% | Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| datasette/views/table.py | Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update beautifulsoup4 requirement from <4.10.0,>=4.8.1 to >=4.8.1,<4.11.0 991121619 | |
942725632 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1469#issuecomment-942725632 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1469 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44MNoA | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-13T21:13:30Z | 2021-10-13T21:13:30Z | OWNER | The core problem here is treating the Instead, I could use a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Column cog shows "facet by this" when already default faceted 994450961 | |
919141156 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1471#issuecomment-919141156 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1471 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c42yPsk | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2021-09-14T13:16:29Z | 2021-10-13T21:12:25Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #1471 +/-==========================================
- Coverage 91.83% 91.83% -0.01% | Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| datasette/views/table.py | Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Bump black from 21.7b0 to 21.9b0 996002181 | |
942722595 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1487#issuecomment-942722595 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1487 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44MM4j | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-13T21:08:53Z | 2021-10-13T21:08:53Z | OWNER | Thanks for this! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added instructions for installing plugins via pipx, #1486 1023245060 | |
941585767 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1432#issuecomment-941585767 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1432 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44H3Vn | ashishdotme 5802411 | 2021-10-12T21:23:19Z | 2021-10-12T21:23:19Z | NONE | Nevermind, had to remove the branch argument in the workflow to make vercel publish work |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rename Datasette.__init__(config=) parameter to settings= 969855774 | |
941274088 | https://github.com/dogsheep/swarm-to-sqlite/issues/12#issuecomment-941274088 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/swarm-to-sqlite/issues/12 | IC_kwDODD6af844GrPo | fs111 33631 | 2021-10-12T18:31:57Z | 2021-10-12T18:31:57Z | NONE | I am running into the same problem. Is there any workaround? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
403 when getting token 951817328 | |
941002127 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1432#issuecomment-941002127 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1432 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44Fo2P | ashishdotme 5802411 | 2021-10-12T13:14:31Z | 2021-10-12T13:14:39Z | NONE | Any workaround for making it work with datasette-publish-vercel. Currently getting below error module initialization error: init() got an unexpected keyword argument 'config' module initialization error init() got an unexpected keyword argument 'config' |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rename Datasette.__init__(config=) parameter to settings= 969855774 | |
940023938 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1485#issuecomment-940023938 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1485 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44B6CC | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2021-10-11T13:18:16Z | 2021-10-11T13:18:16Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #1485 +/-=======================================
Coverage 91.83% 91.83% Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update pytest-timeout requirement from <1.5,>=1.4.2 to >=1.4.2,<2.1 1022688960 | |
939386591 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1470#issuecomment-939386591 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1470 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43_ebf | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-10T01:17:34Z | 2021-10-10T01:17:34Z | OWNER | I'll open a separate issue for removing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
?_sort=rowid with _next= returns error 995098231 | |
939191311 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1482#issuecomment-939191311 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1482 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-uwP | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-09T00:35:04Z | 2021-10-09T00:35:04Z | OWNER | I think that SQLite error message difference was caused by https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a50e28377bcf37121b55c2de70d95a5386c478f8 or related work. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support Python 3.10 1021550542 | |
939185319 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939185319 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-tSn | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-09T00:04:54Z | 2021-10-09T00:04:54Z | OWNER | I applied my PR against Janus to my local copy of Datasette like so:
Then I ran the Datasette tests and got a much happier pass rate. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939180313 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939180313 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-sEZ | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T23:41:39Z | 2021-10-08T23:41:39Z | OWNER | I submitted a PR to Janus with a workaround for this: https://github.com/aio-libs/janus/pull/359 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939100803 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939100803 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-YqD | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T20:33:42Z | 2021-10-08T20:33:42Z | OWNER | There's a tiny chance this could be a bug in Python 3.10 itself - I filed an issue here: https://bugs.python.org/issue45416 - in which I said:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939079727 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939079727 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-Tgv | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T19:50:52Z | 2021-10-08T19:50:52Z | OWNER | And here's the relevant Janus code: https://github.com/aio-libs/janus/blob/d7970f8b76bcac2e087067ca4575ac845e481874/janus/init.py#L24-L42 ```python class Queue(Generic[T]): def init(self, maxsize: int = 0) -> None: self._loop = current_loop() self._maxsize = maxsize
``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939078872 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939078872 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-TTY | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T19:49:08Z | 2021-10-08T19:49:08Z | OWNER | Here's the code that raises that error: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/bb3e0c240bc60fe08d332ff5955d54197f79751c/Lib/asyncio/locks.py#L219-L234 ```python class Condition(_ContextManagerMixin, mixins._LoopBoundMixin): """Asynchronous equivalent to threading.Condition. This class implements condition variable objects. A condition variable allows one or more coroutines to wait until they are notified by another coroutine. A new Lock object is created and used as the underlying lock. """
``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939078095 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939078095 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-THP | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T19:47:29Z | 2021-10-08T19:47:29Z | OWNER | Only mention I can find of that "loop argument must agree with lock" error is here - which doesn't have any tips for a workaround yet: https://giters.com/django/channels_redis/issues/278 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939076399 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939076399 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-Ssv | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T19:43:33Z | 2021-10-08T19:43:33Z | OWNER | So maybe this is an issue with Janus? I'm using https://pypi.org/project/janus/ 0.6.1 which is the latest release, from October 2020. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939075686 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939075686 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-Shm | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T19:42:00Z | 2021-10-08T19:42:00Z | OWNER | Running
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
939074818 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-939074818 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43-SUC | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-08T19:40:23Z | 2021-10-08T19:40:23Z | OWNER | Then I created myself a temporary 3.10 environment using
And used that with my Datasette checkout like so:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
938171377 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-938171377 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4361vx | ghing 110420 | 2021-10-07T21:33:12Z | 2021-10-07T21:33:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for the reply @simonw. What services have you had better success with than Cloud Run for larger database? Also, what about my issue description makes you think there may be a workaround? Is there any instrumentation I could add to see at which point in the deploy the memory usage spikes? Should I be able to see this whether it's running under Docker locally, or do you suspect this is Cloud Run-specific? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
938142436 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1481#issuecomment-938142436 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1481 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c436urk | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-07T20:44:43Z | 2021-10-07T20:44:43Z | OWNER | The 3.10 tests failed a lot. Trying to run this locally: ``` /tmp % pyenv install 3.10 python-build: definition not found: 3.10 The following versions contain `3.10' in the name: 3.10.0a6 3.10-dev miniconda-3.10.1 miniconda3-3.10.1 See all available versions with `pyenv install --list'. If the version you need is missing, try upgrading pyenv: brew update && brew upgrade pyenv ``` So trying:
Then did this:
But it looks like I have
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix compatibility with Python 3.10 1020436713 | |
938134038 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-938134038 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c436soW | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-07T20:31:46Z | 2021-10-07T20:31:46Z | OWNER | I've had this problem too - my solution was to not use Cloud Run for databases larger than about 2GB, but the way you describe it here makes me think that maybe there is a workaround here which could get it to work. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
938131806 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1470#issuecomment-938131806 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1470 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c436sFe | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-07T20:28:30Z | 2021-10-07T20:28:30Z | OWNER | On further investigation this isn't related to
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
?_sort=rowid with _next= returns error 995098231 | |
938124652 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1470#issuecomment-938124652 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1470 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c436qVs | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-07T20:17:53Z | 2021-10-07T20:18:55Z | OWNER | Here's the exception:
So the bug is in this code: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/adb5b70de5cec3c3dd37184defe606a082c232cf/datasette/views/table.py#L604-L617 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
?_sort=rowid with _next= returns error 995098231 | |
934372104 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/3#issuecomment-934372104 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/3 | IC_kwDOD079W843sWMI | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2021-10-05T12:38:24Z | 2021-10-05T12:38:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | As dogsheep-photos already uses osxphotos to load photos you can access the EXIF data via osxphotos. Apple Photos imports a small subset of EXIF data at the time the photo is imported and osxphotos provides this via the exif_info property. If you want the full EXIF data, osxphotos also provides a wrapper around exiftool. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Import EXIF data into SQLite - lens used, ISO, aperture etc 602533481 | |
934207940 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/3#issuecomment-934207940 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/3 | IC_kwDOD079W843ruHE | jratike80 1751612 | 2021-10-05T08:57:41Z | 2021-10-05T08:57:41Z | NONE | Maybe the exif-loader from the SpatiaLite project could be useful as a reference even it is written in C and it also saves images as blobs https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/spatialite-tools/file?name=exif_loader.c&ci=tip. The tool is also integrated into the spatialite-gui application. I found some user documentation from the web archive http://web.archive.org/web/20180629041238/https://www.gaia-gis.it/spatialite-2.3.1/spatialite-exif-2.3.1.html. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Import EXIF data into SQLite - lens used, ISO, aperture etc 602533481 | |
932808216 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1479#issuecomment-932808216 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1479 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43mYYY | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-02T19:25:09Z | 2021-10-02T19:25:09Z | OWNER | Actually no, from that stack trace you provided:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Win32 "used by another process" error with datasette publish 1010112818 | |
932808043 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1479#issuecomment-932808043 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1479 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43mYVr | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-02T19:23:52Z | 2021-10-02T19:23:52Z | OWNER | I suspect the root cause of this may be in this code: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/63886178a649586b403966a27a45881709d2b868/datasette/utils/init.py#L673-L677 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Win32 "used by another process" error with datasette publish 1010112818 | |
932807859 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1479#issuecomment-932807859 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1479 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43mYSz | simonw 9599 | 2021-10-02T19:22:35Z | 2021-10-02T19:22:35Z | OWNER | I'm pretty sure this is a Windows issue, not a Fly issue. I imagine it affects other forms of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Win32 "used by another process" error with datasette publish 1010112818 | |
930071625 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1479#issuecomment-930071625 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1479 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43b8RJ | kirajano 76450761 | 2021-09-29T11:01:30Z | 2021-09-29T11:01:30Z | NONE | Thanks, but this one has a different error type. Unfortunately, still not working. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Win32 "used by another process" error with datasette publish 1010112818 | |
929927144 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1479#issuecomment-929927144 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1479 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c43bY_o | soobrosa 1244799 | 2021-09-29T07:49:40Z | 2021-09-29T07:49:40Z | NONE | My search yielded these four entries: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues?q=PermissionError%3A+%5BWinError+32%5D+ Maybe this is the closet hit? https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/744 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Win32 "used by another process" error with datasette publish 1010112818 | |
929651819 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/pull/66#issuecomment-929651819 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/66 | IC_kwDODFdgUs43aVxr | sarcasticadmin 30531572 | 2021-09-28T21:50:31Z | 2021-09-28T21:50:31Z | NONE | @simonw any feedback/thoughts? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add --merged-by flag to pull-requests sub command 975161924 | |
928790381 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/98#issuecomment-928790381 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/98 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM43XDdt | patricktrainer 36834097 | 2021-09-28T04:38:44Z | 2021-09-28T04:38:44Z | NONE | Hi @simonw - wondering if you might be able to shed some light here. I've seemed to reproduce this issue. Here's the stacktrace: ``` ... db["potholes"].insert(pothole, pk='id', alter=True, replace=True) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 3, in <module> File "/Users/patricktrainer/.pyenv/versions/3.9.0/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py", line 2481, in insert return self.insert_all( File "/Users/patricktrainer/.pyenv/versions/3.9.0/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py", line 2596, in insert_all self.insert_chunk( File "/Users/patricktrainer/.pyenv/versions/3.9.0/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py", line 2424, in insert_chunk row = list(self.rows_where("rowid = ?", [self.last_rowid]))[0] IndexError: list index out of range ``` Interesting enough, I found that omitting the Let me know how I can help out! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Only set .last_rowid and .last_pk for single update/inserts, not for .insert_all()/.upsert_all() with multiple records 597671518 | |
927312650 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/54#issuecomment-927312650 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/54 | IC_kwDODEm0Qs43RasK | danp 2182 | 2021-09-26T14:09:51Z | 2021-09-26T14:09:51Z | NONE | Similar trouble with ageinfo using 0.22. Here's what my ageinfo.js file looks like:
Commenting out the registration for ageinfo in archive.py gets my archive to import. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Archive import appears to be broken on recent exports 779088071 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue >1000