issue_comments
7 rows where "created_at" is on date 2022-04-08 sorted by html_url
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, updated_at (date)
issue 3
id | html_url ▼ | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1092321966 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092321966 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BG4Ku | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-08T00:20:32Z | 2022-04-08T00:20:56Z | OWNER | If we do this I'm keen to have it be more than just an alternative to the existing My best thought on how to differentiate them so far is plugins: if Datasette plugins that provide alternative outputs - like One way that could work: a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1092357672 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092357672 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHA4o | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T01:39:40Z | 2022-04-08T01:39:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
That's my thinking, too. It's really the thing I've been wanting since writing
I think this probably needs either a new plugin hook separate from |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1092361727 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092361727 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHB3_ | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-08T01:47:43Z | 2022-04-08T01:47:43Z | OWNER | A render mode for that plugin hook that writes to a stream is exactly what I have in mind: - #1062 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1092370880 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092370880 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHEHA | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T02:07:40Z | 2022-04-08T02:07:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So maybe
And stream gets an iterator, instead of a list of rows, so it can efficiently handle large queries. Maybe it also gets passed a destination stream, or it returns an iterator. I'm not sure what makes more sense. Either way, that might cover both CLI exports and streaming responses. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1092386254 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092386254 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHH3O | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T02:39:25Z | 2022-04-08T02:39:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | And just to think this through a little more, here's what
Alternately, that could be an async generator, like this:
Not sure which makes more sense, but I think this pattern would open up a lot of possibility. If you had your stream_indented_json function, you could do |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1093454899 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1693#issuecomment-1093454899 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1693 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BLMwz | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-08T23:07:04Z | 2022-04-08T23:07:04Z | OWNER | Tests failed here due to this issue: - https://github.com/psf/black/pull/2987 A future Black release should fix that. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Bump black from 22.1.0 to 22.3.0 1184850337 | |
1092850719 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1703#issuecomment-1092850719 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1703 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BI5Qf | codecov[bot] 22429695 | 2022-04-08T13:18:04Z | 2022-04-08T13:18:04Z | NONE | Codecov Report
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ main #1703 +/-=======================================
Coverage 91.75% 91.75% Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update beautifulsoup4 requirement from <4.11.0,>=4.8.1 to >=4.8.1,<4.12.0 1197298420 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3