issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and issue = 1383646615 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Ability to merge databases and tables · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1264218914 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491#issuecomment-1264218914 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LWnMi | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-10-01T03:18:36Z | 2023-06-14T22:14:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I actually found myself wanting something like this the past couple days. The use-case was databases with slightly different schema but same table names. here is a full script: ``` import argparse from pathlib import Path from sqlite_utils import Database def connect(args, conn=None, kwargs) -> Database: db = Database(conn or args.database, kwargs) with db.conn: db.conn.execute("PRAGMA main.cache_size = 8000") return db def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace: parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() parser.add_argument("database") parser.add_argument("dbs_folder") parser.add_argument("--db", "-db", help=argparse.SUPPRESS) parser.add_argument("--verbose", "-v", action="count", default=0) args = parser.parse_args()
def merge_db(args, source_db): source_db = str(Path(source_db).resolve())
def merge_directory(): args = parse_args() source_dbs = list(Path(args.dbs_folder).glob('*.db')) for s_db in source_dbs: merge_db(args, s_db) if name == 'main': merge_directory() ``` edit: I've made some improvements to this and put it on PyPI: ``` $ pip install xklb $ lb merge-db -h usage: library merge-dbs DEST_DB SOURCE_DB ... [--only-target-columns] [--only-new-rows] [--upsert] [--pk PK ...] [--table TABLE ...]
positional arguments: database source_dbs ``` Also if you want to dedupe a table based on a "business key" which isn't explicitly your primary key(s) you can run this: ``` $ lb dedupe-db -h usage: library dedupe-dbs DATABASE TABLE --bk BUSINESS_KEYS [--pk PRIMARY_KEYS] [--only-columns COLUMNS]
positional arguments: database table options: -h, --help show this help message and exit --skip-0 --only-columns ONLY_COLUMNS Comma separated column names to upsert --primary-keys PRIMARY_KEYS, --pk PRIMARY_KEYS Comma separated primary keys --business-keys BUSINESS_KEYS, --bk BUSINESS_KEYS Comma separated business keys ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to merge databases and tables 1383646615 | |
1258712931 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491#issuecomment-1258712931 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LBm9j | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-09-26T22:31:58Z | 2022-09-26T22:31:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Right. The backup command will copy tables completely, but in the case of conflicting table names, the destination gets overwritten silently. That might not be what you want here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to merge databases and tables 1383646615 | |
1258508215 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491#issuecomment-1258508215 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LA0-3 | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-09-26T19:22:14Z | 2022-09-26T19:22:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This might be fairly straightforward using SQLite's backup utility: https://docs.python.org/3/library/sqlite3.html#sqlite3.Connection.backup |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to merge databases and tables 1383646615 | |
1256858763 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491#issuecomment-1256858763 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5K6iSL | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-09-24T04:50:59Z | 2022-09-24T04:52:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Instead of outputting binary data to stdout the interface might be better like this
similar to Actually I think this might already be possible within
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to merge databases and tables 1383646615 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2