issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 327365110 and user = 45057 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • russss · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • inspect should record column types · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 1 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
405026800 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/294#issuecomment-405026800 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/294 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTAyNjgwMA== russss 45057 2018-07-14T14:24:31Z 2018-07-14T14:24:31Z CONTRIBUTOR

I had a quick look at this in relation to #343 and I feel like it might be worth modelling the inspected table metadata internally as an object rather than a dict. (We'd still have to serialise it back to JSON.)

There are a few places where we rely on the structure of this metadata dict for various reasons, including in templates (and potentially also in user templates). It would be nice to have a reasonably well defined API for accessing metadata internally so that it's clearer what we're breaking.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 inspect should record column types 327365110  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);