issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and "updated_at" is on date 2019-11-03 sorted by id
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
549094195 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/pull/8#issuecomment-549094195 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/8 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NDE5NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T00:43:16Z | 2019-11-03T00:43:28Z | MEMBER | Also need to take #5 into account - if this command creates incomplete user records, how do we repair them? And make sure that if we run this command first any future commands that populate users don't break (probably just a case of using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
stargazers command, refs #4 516763727 | |
549094229 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/5#issuecomment-549094229 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/5 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NDIyOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T00:44:03Z | 2019-11-03T00:44:03Z | MEMBER | Might not need an incomplete boolean - may be possible to handle this with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add "incomplete" boolean to users table for incomplete profiles 493671014 | |
549095217 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27#issuecomment-549095217 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NTIxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T01:06:25Z | 2019-11-03T01:06:25Z | MEMBER | Wow, that It looks like this needs to be combined with this API - https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/tweets/post-and-engage/api-reference/get-statuses-retweets-id - to fetch the details of up to 100 recent users who actually DID retweet an individual status. But that has a one-every-12-seconds rate limit on it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
retweets-of-me command 514459062 | |
549095317 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27#issuecomment-549095317 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NTMxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T01:08:10Z | 2019-11-03T01:08:10Z | MEMBER | Hmm... one thing that could be useful is that I'm not sure if the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
retweets-of-me command 514459062 | |
549095463 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27#issuecomment-549095463 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NTQ2Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T01:10:52Z | 2019-11-03T01:10:52Z | MEMBER | I imagine it won't, since the data I would be recording and then passing to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
retweets-of-me command 514459062 | |
549095641 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27#issuecomment-549095641 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/27 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NTY0MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T01:12:58Z | 2019-11-03T01:12:58Z | MEMBER | It looks like Twitter really want you to subscribe to a premium API for this kind of thing and consume retweets via webhooks: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/accounts-and-users/subscribe-account-activity/api-reference I'm going to give up on this for the moment. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
retweets-of-me command 514459062 | |
549096321 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3#issuecomment-549096321 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NjMyMQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T01:27:55Z | 2019-11-03T01:28:17Z | MEMBER | It would be neat if this could support |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search 488833975 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4