issue_comments
9 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and "updated_at" is on date 2020-04-01 sorted by id
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date)
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
606850008 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39#issuecomment-606850008 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNjg1MDAwOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-03-31T20:13:59Z | 2020-04-01T00:23:00Z | MEMBER | Table design for type | key | since_id --- | --- | --- 1 | 124324 | 2347239847293 2 | 99ff9cefff5cbfd804f7cd43e2b27ced8addbe8d | 2125947927344 Primary compound key on
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
--since feature can be confused by retweets 590666760 | |
606850453 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39#issuecomment-606850453 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNjg1MDQ1Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-03-31T20:14:58Z | 2020-04-01T03:03:50Z | MEMBER | Actually I'll hard-code the population of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
--since feature can be confused by retweets 590666760 | |
606998669 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39#issuecomment-606998669 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNjk5ODY2OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T02:57:36Z | 2020-04-01T02:57:36Z | MEMBER | The tricky thing here is thinking about the interaction between the recorded since_id and a desire to run the initial import. The first time you run We need to record the maximum ID from those as the But what happens if our initial import is cancelled after only a few tweets? We risk never pulling in the rest of the tweets. Not sure if I need to solve this at all or if I should instead trust users to run the command a second time without I had considered letting |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
--since feature can be confused by retweets 590666760 | |
607003655 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39#issuecomment-607003655 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAwMzY1NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:18:00Z | 2020-04-01T03:18:00Z | MEMBER | I've got this working for the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
--since feature can be confused by retweets 590666760 | |
607010634 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39#issuecomment-607010634 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/39 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxMDYzNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:45:16Z | 2020-04-01T03:45:16Z | MEMBER | OK, fix is applied to everything now. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
--since feature can be confused by retweets 590666760 | |
607010791 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/10#issuecomment-607010791 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/10 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxMDc5MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:45:48Z | 2020-04-01T03:45:48Z | MEMBER | I'm happy with the recent work I did on this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink progress bars for various commands 492297930 | |
607011421 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-607011421 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxMTQyMQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:47:37Z | 2020-04-01T03:55:08Z | MEMBER | Actually a single table with a In which case the compound primary key would be |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 | |
607011972 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-607011972 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxMTk3Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:49:02Z | 2020-04-01T03:50:01Z | MEMBER | I want the datetime value to look like
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 | |
607019151 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-607019151 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxOTE1MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T04:11:10Z | 2020-04-01T04:11:10Z | MEMBER | In testing this collects a LOT of data. I'm going to skip tracking favourites_count and statuses_count and just track followers, friends and listed instead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3