issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 664485022 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Feature: pull request reviews and comments · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
735483820 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46#issuecomment-735483820 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTQ4MzgyMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T00:27:47Z | 2020-11-30T00:27:47Z | MEMBER | So it looks like anything that pulls reviews needs to pull each review, then for each one pull the comments. I'm going to consider this blocked on smarter rate limit handling in #51. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: pull request reviews and comments 664485022 | |
735483604 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46#issuecomment-735483604 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTQ4MzYwNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T00:26:50Z | 2020-11-30T00:26:50Z | MEMBER | It seems like there's a lot missing from that - those aren't particularly interesting given the data that is returned. From the docs at https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/reference/pulls#reviews it looks like each review consists of multiple comments, and the comments are where the useful material is - https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/reference/pulls#list-comments-for-a-pull-request-review
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: pull request reviews and comments 664485022 | |
735482546 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46#issuecomment-735482546 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTQ4MjU0Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T00:22:02Z | 2020-11-30T00:22:02Z | MEMBER | As for reviews... here's the output of
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: pull request reviews and comments 664485022 | |
735482187 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46#issuecomment-735482187 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTQ4MjE4Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-11-30T00:20:11Z | 2020-11-30T00:20:11Z | MEMBER | Pull request are now added, thanks to @adamjonas. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: pull request reviews and comments 664485022 | |
675259273 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46#issuecomment-675259273 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NTI1OTI3Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-08-18T05:28:32Z | 2020-08-18T05:28:32Z | MEMBER | Oh that's interesting - i didn't realize "reviews" were a separate concept. I'd definitely accept a pull request adding those! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: pull request reviews and comments 664485022 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1