issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "NONE", issue = 1058896236 and user = 17906 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Deploy a live instance of demos/apache-proxy · 1 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
974607456 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1522#issuecomment-974607456 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1522 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c46F1Rg | mrchrisadams 17906 | 2021-11-20T07:10:11Z | 2021-11-20T07:10:11Z | NONE | As a a sanity check, would it be worth looking at trying to push the multi-process container on another provider of a knative / cloud run / tekton ? I have a somewhat similar use case for a future proejct, so i'm been very grateful to you sharing all the progress in this issue. As I understand it, Scaleway also offer a very similar offering using what appear to be many similar components that might at least see if it's an issue with more than one knative based FaaS provider https://www.scaleway.com/en/serverless-containers/ https://developers.scaleway.com/en/products/containers/api/#main-features |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Deploy a live instance of demos/apache-proxy 1058896236 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1