issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "NONE", issue = 1421552095 and user = 4399499 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Default API token authentication mechanism · 1 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1291277913 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291277913 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M91ZZ | ocdtrekkie 4399499 | 2022-10-26T00:26:11Z | 2022-10-26T00:26:11Z | NONE |
This is what we do for Sandstorm essentially and I fully agree it's the right way to do API tokens in multiuser systems. Constraints will definitely be important though. I know I want a token to submit error reports programmatically, but I wouldn't want that token to convey my right to delete tables and records, Little Bobby Tables is out there somewhere, and he's all grown up now. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Default API token authentication mechanism 1421552095 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1