issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "NONE", issue_url = "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983" and "updated_at" is on date 2020-12-31 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
753224999 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753224999 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIyNDk5OQ== | jussiarpalahti 11941245 | 2020-12-31T23:29:36Z | 2020-12-31T23:29:36Z | NONE | I have yet to build Datasette plugin and am unfamiliar with Pluggy. Since browsers have event handling builtin Datasette could communicate with plugins through it. Handlers register as listeners for custom Datasette events and Datasette's JS can then trigger said events. I was also wondering if you had looked at Javascript Modules for JS plugins? With services like Skypack (https://www.skypack.dev) NPM libraries can be loaded directly into browser, no build step needed. Same goes for local JS if you adhere to ES Module spec. If minification is required then tools such as Snowpack (https://www.snowpack.dev) could fit better. It uses https://github.com/evanw/esbuild for bundling and minification. On plugins you'd simply:
In Datasette HTML pages' head you'd merely import these files as modules one by one. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
753218817 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753218817 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxODgxNw== | yozlet 173848 | 2020-12-31T22:32:25Z | 2020-12-31T22:32:25Z | NONE | Amazing work! And you've put in far more work than I'd expect to reduce the payload (which is admirable). So, to add a plugin with the current design, it goes in (a) the template or (b) a bookmarklet, right? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752882797 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752882797 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjg4Mjc5Nw== | dracos 154364 | 2020-12-31T08:07:59Z | 2020-12-31T15:04:32Z | NONE | If you're using arrow functions, you can presumably use default parameters, not much difference in support. That would save you 9 bytes. But OTOH you need Your latest 250-byte one, with use strict, gzips to 199 bytes. The following might be 292 bytes, but compresses to 204, basically the same, and works in any browser (well, IE9+) at all:
Source for that is below; I replaced the [fn,parameters] because closure-compiler includes a polyfill for that, and I ran
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752888552 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752888552 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjg4ODU1Mg== | dracos 154364 | 2020-12-31T08:33:11Z | 2020-12-31T08:34:27Z | NONE | If you could say that all hook functions had to accept one options parameter (and could use object destructuring if they wished to only see a subset), you could have this, which minifies (to all-browser-JS) to 200 bytes, gzips to 146, and works practically the same:
Called the same, definitions tiny bit different:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3