issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "NONE" and "updated_at" is on date 2023-04-01 sorted by updated_at descending

✖
✖
✖

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
1493052396 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/265#issuecomment-1493052396 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/265 IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Y_ivs dracos 154364 2023-04-01T17:27:18Z 2023-04-01T17:27:18Z NONE

enable_fts is a function in datasette, not in this repo, which doesn't do any escaping of search terms. It sounds like from https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/full_text_search.html#advanced-sqlite-search-queries you might want to enable raw searching, as otherwise it's disabled and everything is escaped by default.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Using enable_fts before search term 907795562  
1493051222 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/159#issuecomment-1493051222 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/159 IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Y_idW dracos 154364 2023-04-01T17:21:05Z 2023-04-01T17:21:05Z NONE

In a related issue, nearly a year later I just stumbled across this again, as I wondered why none of my rebuild-fts were rebuilding. It looks like: disable_fts in db.py commits; enable_fts partly commits except the last step (due to executescript committing a pending transaction); rebuild_fts won't commit unless manually done as above with e.g. a context manager.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 .delete_where() does not auto-commit (unlike .insert() or .upsert()) 702386948  
1492777509 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/235#issuecomment-1492777509 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/235 IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Y-fol hydrosquall 9020979 2023-04-01T01:31:48Z 2023-04-01T01:31:48Z NONE

My current workaround is to use this library from a python script instead of as a CLI tool.

This lets me set the foreign key constraint at table creation time, instead of trying to modify an existing table. docs

I found this stackoverflow helpful, as it explained that Sqlite doesn't support modifying existing tables directly.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Extract columns cannot create foreign key relation: sqlite3.OperationalError: table sqlite_master may not be modified 810618495  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);