issue_comments
9 rows where author_association = "NONE" and user = 30934 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- 20after4 · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1722943484 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2052#issuecomment-1722943484 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2052 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5msgf8 | 20after4 30934 | 2023-09-18T08:14:47Z | 2023-09-18T08:14:47Z | NONE | This is such a well thought out contribution. I don't think I've seen such a thoroughly considered PR on any project in recent memory. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
feat: Javascript Plugin API (Custom panels, column menu items with JS actions) 1651082214 | |
988468238 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1528#issuecomment-988468238 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1528 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c466tQO | 20after4 30934 | 2021-12-08T03:35:45Z | 2021-12-08T03:35:45Z | NONE | FWIW I implemented something similar with a bit of plugin code: ```python @hookimpl def canned_queries(datasette: Datasette, database: str) -> Mapping[str, str]: # load "canned queries" from the filesystem under # www/sql/db/query_name.sql queries = {}
``` |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add new `"sql_file"` key to Canned Queries in metadata? 1060631257 | |
988463455 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1304#issuecomment-988463455 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1304 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c466sFf | 20after4 30934 | 2021-12-08T03:23:14Z | 2021-12-08T03:23:14Z | NONE | I actually think it would be a useful thing to add support for in datasette. It wouldn't be difficult to unwind an array of params and add the placeholders automatically. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Document how to send multiple values for "Named parameters" 863884805 | |
988461884 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1304#issuecomment-988461884 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1304 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c466rs8 | 20after4 30934 | 2021-12-08T03:20:26Z | 2021-12-08T03:20:26Z | NONE | The easiest or most straightforward thing to do is to use named parameters like:
And simply construct the list of placeholders dynamically based on the number of values. Doing this is possible with datasette if you forgo "canned queries" and just use the raw query endpoint and pass the query sql, along with p1, p2 ... in the request. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Document how to send multiple values for "Named parameters" 863884805 | |
982745406 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1532#issuecomment-982745406 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c46k4E- | 20after4 30934 | 2021-11-30T15:28:57Z | 2021-11-30T15:28:57Z | NONE | It's a really great API and the documentation is really great too. Honestly, in more than 20 years of professional experience, I haven't worked with any software API that was more of a joy to use. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0 1065429936 | |
981980048 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1304#issuecomment-981980048 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1304 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c46h9OQ | 20after4 30934 | 2021-11-29T20:13:53Z | 2021-11-29T20:14:11Z | NONE | There isn't any way to do this with sqlite as far as I know. The only option is to insert the right number of ? placeholders into the sql template and then provide an array of values. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Document how to send multiple values for "Named parameters" 863884805 | |
981966693 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1532#issuecomment-981966693 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c46h59l | 20after4 30934 | 2021-11-29T19:56:52Z | 2021-11-29T19:56:52Z | NONE | FWIW I've written some web components that consume the json api and I think it's a really nice way to work with datasette. I like the combination with datasette+sqlite as a back-end feeding data to a front-end that's entirely javascript + html. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0 1065429936 | |
951740637 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/878#issuecomment-951740637 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/878 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44umjd | 20after4 30934 | 2021-10-26T09:12:15Z | 2021-10-26T09:12:15Z | NONE | This sounds really ambitious but also really awesome. I like the idea that basically any piece of a page could be selectively replaced. It sort of sounds like a python asyncio version of https://github.com/observablehq/runtime |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New pattern for views that return either JSON or HTML, available for plugins 648435885 | |
951731255 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1204#issuecomment-951731255 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1204 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44ukQ3 | 20after4 30934 | 2021-10-26T09:01:28Z | 2021-10-26T09:01:28Z | NONE |
Why not return a data structure instead of just a template name? I've already done some custom hacking to modify datasette but the plugin mechanism you are building here would be much cleaner than what I've built. I'd be happy to help with testing this PR and fleshing it out further if you are still considering merging this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: Plugin includes 793002853 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 6