issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where author_association = "NONE" and user = 8451755 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • kokes · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 1 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
946493045 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/942#issuecomment-946493045 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/942 IC_kwDOBm6k_c44alZ1 kokes 8451755 2021-10-19T08:42:39Z 2021-10-19T08:42:39Z NONE

@simonw I know this is closed, just found this via the annotated release notes, but I wanted to note this one thing:

Not sure how widely used this is, but I've seen CSVW a couple times in the wild. It is trying to address these metadata challenges in a standardised way.

See e.g. - https://www.w3.org/TR/tabular-data-primer/#h-documentation-columns - https://w3c.github.io/csvw/tests/

I'm not suggesting you change the syntax you've implemented, just letting you know of this effort by W3C.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Support column descriptions in metadata.json 681334912  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);