issue_comments
19 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and "updated_at" is on date 2022-03-11 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date)
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1065597709 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411#issuecomment-1065597709 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_g7sN | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T22:32:43Z | 2022-03-11T22:32:43Z | OWNER | Trying to figure out what that extra field in
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for generated columns 1160034488 | |
1065596417 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411#issuecomment-1065596417 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_g7YB | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T22:30:15Z | 2022-03-11T22:30:15Z | OWNER | I tried it out in Jupyter and it works as advertised: Introspection is a bit weird: there doesn't seem to be a way to introspect generated columns outside of parsing the stored SQL schema for the columns at the moment! And the Here's why: ```
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for generated columns 1160034488 | |
1065402557 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411#issuecomment-1065402557 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gMC9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T19:01:08Z | 2022-03-11T21:42:25Z | OWNER | Just spotted this in https://www.sqlite.org/gencol.html
So to add stored columns to an existing table we would need to use the Here's where |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for generated columns 1160034488 | |
1065389386 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411#issuecomment-1065389386 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gI1K | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:42:53Z | 2022-03-11T21:40:51Z | OWNER | The Python API could be:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for generated columns 1160034488 | |
1065458729 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411#issuecomment-1065458729 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gZwp | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T19:58:50Z | 2022-03-11T20:00:25Z | OWNER | I'm coming round to your suggestion to have this as extra arguments to I'd like to come up with syntax for https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli-reference.html#create-table Maybe extra |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for generated columns 1160034488 | |
1065440445 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411#issuecomment-1065440445 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gVS9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T19:52:15Z | 2022-03-11T19:52:15Z | OWNER | Two new parameters to
These columns will be added at the end of the table, but you can use the |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for generated columns 1160034488 | |
1065386352 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411#issuecomment-1065386352 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gIFw | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:41:37Z | 2022-03-11T18:41:37Z | OWNER | I like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for generated columns 1160034488 | |
1065384183 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414#issuecomment-1065384183 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gHj3 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:40:39Z | 2022-03-11T18:40:39Z | OWNER | That fixed it: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
I forgot to include the changelog in the 3.25.1 release 1166731361 | |
1065382145 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414#issuecomment-1065382145 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gHEB | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:39:05Z | 2022-03-11T18:39:05Z | OWNER | https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/3.25.1/changelog.html is currently wrong: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
I forgot to include the changelog in the 3.25.1 release 1166731361 | |
1065381047 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414#issuecomment-1065381047 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gGy3 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:38:27Z | 2022-03-11T18:38:27Z | OWNER | OK that fixed it here: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/changelog.html I'm going to trigger a rebuild of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
I forgot to include the changelog in the 3.25.1 release 1166731361 | |
1065380286 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414#issuecomment-1065380286 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gGm- | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:37:23Z | 2022-03-11T18:37:23Z | OWNER | On ReadTheDocs that triggered a new |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
I forgot to include the changelog in the 3.25.1 release 1166731361 | |
1065379528 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414#issuecomment-1065379528 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gGbI | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:36:17Z | 2022-03-11T18:36:17Z | OWNER | I created a new tag and release: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/releases/tag/3.25.1 And I cancelled the publish workflow: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/actions/runs/1970415399 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
I forgot to include the changelog in the 3.25.1 release 1166731361 | |
1065378902 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414#issuecomment-1065378902 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gGRW | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:35:26Z | 2022-03-11T18:35:26Z | OWNER | I deleted both the release and the tag from GitHub using the web interface. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
I forgot to include the changelog in the 3.25.1 release 1166731361 | |
1065377926 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414#issuecomment-1065377926 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/414 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gGCG | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:34:05Z | 2022-03-11T18:34:05Z | OWNER | Two options:
I'm going to try and do that first option. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
I forgot to include the changelog in the 3.25.1 release 1166731361 | |
1065357081 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413#issuecomment-1065357081 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_gA8Z | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T18:07:10Z | 2022-03-11T18:07:10Z | OWNER | I'm really happy with this improvement. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Display autodoc type information more legibly 1166587040 | |
1065345515 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413#issuecomment-1065345515 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_f-Hr | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T17:52:22Z | 2022-03-11T17:52:22Z | OWNER | Well this is a huge improvement! https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/reference.html#sqlite_utils.db.Table.insert I'm not crazy about the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Display autodoc type information more legibly 1166587040 | |
1065249883 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413#issuecomment-1065249883 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_fmxb | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T16:03:35Z | 2022-03-11T16:03:35Z | OWNER | Applying this change fixes that:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Display autodoc type information more legibly 1166587040 | |
1065247619 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413#issuecomment-1065247619 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_fmOD | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T16:01:20Z | 2022-03-11T16:01:20Z | OWNER | Definitely an improvement! It does highlight that I'm not currently using the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Display autodoc type information more legibly 1166587040 | |
1065245831 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413#issuecomment-1065245831 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/413 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM4_flyH | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-11T15:59:14Z | 2022-03-11T15:59:14Z | OWNER | Hint from https://twitter.com/AdamChainz/status/1502311047612575745
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Display autodoc type information more legibly 1166587040 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3