issue_comments
17 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "created_at" is on date 2020-06-03, "updated_at" is on date 2020-06-03 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date)
user 1
- simonw · 17 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
638462052 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/793#issuecomment-638462052 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/793 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODQ2MjA1Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T21:07:39Z | 2020-06-03T21:07:39Z | OWNER | I need to land and release the fix for signing cookies in https://github.com/simonw/asgi-csrf/issues/2 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CSRF protection for /-/messages tool and writable canned queries 629524205 | |
638461797 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/797#issuecomment-638461797 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/797 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODQ2MTc5Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T21:07:06Z | 2020-06-03T21:07:06Z | OWNER | Docs here (search for "params"): https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/sql_queries.html#canned-queries-named-parameters |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation for new "params" setting for canned queries 630120235 | |
638289878 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/797#issuecomment-638289878 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/797 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI4OTg3OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T15:57:47Z | 2020-06-03T15:57:47Z | OWNER | Also mention ability to pre-fill the form for writable canned queries using the querystring. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation for new "params" setting for canned queries 630120235 | |
638266171 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-638266171 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/698 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI2NjE3MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T15:18:49Z | 2020-06-03T15:18:49Z | OWNER | Landed the work so far from #796! Here's the documentation: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/sql_queries.html#writable-canned-queries |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability for a canned query to write to the database 582517965 | |
638265394 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/793#issuecomment-638265394 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/793 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI2NTM5NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T15:17:35Z | 2020-06-03T15:17:51Z | OWNER | I need this for writable canned queries in #698 and #796 too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CSRF protection for /-/messages tool and writable canned queries 629524205 | |
638257697 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638257697 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI1NzY5Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T15:05:07Z | 2020-06-03T15:05:07Z | OWNER | I'm going to document this, land it and then continue to work on the other pieces - CSRF protection and .json mode - in separate tickets. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638249652 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638249652 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI0OTY1Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T14:51:29Z | 2020-06-03T14:51:51Z | OWNER | Consider this one:
Maybe allow an optional |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638241738 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638241738 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI0MTczOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T14:38:45Z | 2020-06-03T14:38:45Z | OWNER | Violating a unique constraint will throw an error. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638241366 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638241366 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI0MTM2Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T14:38:03Z | 2020-06-03T14:38:31Z | OWNER | Maybe I need some kind of optional validation mechanism? SQLite lets me insert text or floating point numbers into integer columns right now, which feels wrong. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638240919 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638240919 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODI0MDkxOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T14:37:22Z | 2020-06-03T14:37:22Z | OWNER | I'm having trouble coming up with a canned SQL query that will only error with certain parameters, which I need in order to test out the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638238144 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638238144 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODIzODE0NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T14:32:54Z | 2020-06-03T14:33:11Z | OWNER | I'm going to have |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638188196 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638188196 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODE4ODE5Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T13:13:27Z | 2020-06-03T14:32:27Z | OWNER | "Query executed" is the default message, but it's pretty bland: How about letting queries define custom success messages in their metadata configuration?
How can the system tell if an "update" query was actually successful? Maybe I should expose |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638206851 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638206851 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODIwNjg1MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T13:44:29Z | 2020-06-03T13:44:29Z | OWNER | Default message is now "Query executed, 1 row affected" as of https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796/commits/f45c44ac8f3a9a2182d76c6bda44a06676499e4b |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638205923 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/796#issuecomment-638205923 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODIwNTkyMw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T13:43:12Z | 2020-06-03T13:43:12Z | OWNER | For |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New WIP writable canned queries 629595228 | |
638183337 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-638183337 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/698 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzODE4MzMzNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T13:05:03Z | 2020-06-03T13:05:03Z | OWNER | One challenge with this feature is that it confuses the messaging about what Datasette does somewhat. Prior to shipping this, Datasette's core value proposition is as a way to publish read-only data. That changed a little in 0.37 in February when plugins gained the supported ability to execute writes, but there was no way of doing that without a plugin. With this feature, Datasette becomes a read-write database solution. I should update the documentation to help explain this. Essentially the message is that Datasette can be used in one of two "modes" - it can be used just for sharing/publishing data, or you can use it to collect and manage data, most likely still in collaboration with plugins for things like authentication. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability for a canned query to write to the database 582517965 | |
637934813 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-637934813 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/698 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzkzNDgxMw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T03:45:07Z | 2020-06-03T03:45:07Z | OWNER | Some extra thoughts now that this is mostly working:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability for a canned query to write to the database 582517965 | |
637879242 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-637879242 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/698 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzg3OTI0Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-03T00:10:30Z | 2020-06-03T00:10:30Z | OWNER | Started a fresh pull request for this in #796 - the one in #703 got a bit untidy. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability for a canned query to write to the database 582517965 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4