issue_comments
11 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and "created_at" is on date 2020-07-01 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw 11
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
652681996 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/885#issuecomment-652681996 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/885 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjY4MTk5Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T22:44:47Z | 2020-07-01T22:44:47Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Blog entry about the release 649373451 | ||
652663177 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/882#issuecomment-652663177 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjY2MzE3Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T21:48:08Z | 2020-07-01T21:48:08Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release notes for 0.45 648673556 | ||
652646487 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/880#issuecomment-652646487 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/880 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjY0NjQ4Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T21:05:48Z | 2020-07-01T21:05:48Z | OWNER | I've been testing the WIP using this in the console:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
POST to /db/canned-query that returns JSON should be supported (for API clients) 648637666 | |
652604569 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/882#issuecomment-652604569 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjYwNDU2OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T19:27:17Z | 2020-07-01T19:27:17Z | OWNER | Don't forget to update the news in the README. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release notes for 0.45 648673556 | |
652597975 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652597975 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjU5Nzk3NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T19:12:15Z | 2020-07-01T19:12:15Z | OWNER | The latest release of https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens (0.2) now supports SQL configuration of tokens. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105 | |
652520496 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652520496 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjUyMDQ5Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T16:26:52Z | 2020-07-01T16:26:52Z | OWNER | Tokens get verified by plugins. So far there's only one: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens - which has you hard-coding plugins in a configuration file. I have a issue there to add support for database-backed tokens too: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens/issues/1 |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105 | |
652182990 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/877#issuecomment-652182990 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE4Mjk5MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T04:29:38Z | 2020-07-01T04:42:59Z | OWNER | Have you tried the method described here? https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/internals.html#csrf-protection - I'm happy to bulk out that section of the documentation if that doesn't help solve your problem. I just closed #835 which should make CSRF protection easier to work with - it won't interfere with requests without cookies or requests with You can try out |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Consider dropping explicit CSRF protection entirely? 648421105 | |
652165709 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/812#issuecomment-652165709 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/812 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE2NTcwOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T03:26:35Z | 2020-07-01T03:26:35Z | OWNER | This case may not be covered without extra work: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/3ec5b1abf6afa2d22a3378092809a1a8c0249d26/datasette/views/database.py#L122-L123 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to customize what happens when a view permission fails 634112607 | |
652163450 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/812#issuecomment-652163450 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/812 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE2MzQ1MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T03:18:51Z | 2020-07-01T03:20:28Z | OWNER | This can be a plugin hook:
Maybe the hook can instead use the I'm going to leave |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to customize what happens when a view permission fails 634112607 | |
652162722 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/880#issuecomment-652162722 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/880 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE2MjcyMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T03:16:07Z | 2020-07-01T03:16:07Z | OWNER | The response from this will never be a 302 - it will always be a 200 if the response worked or a 400 for bad parameters or a 500 for errors. The body returned will always be in JSON format. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
POST to /db/canned-query that returns JSON should be supported (for API clients) 648637666 | |
652159398 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/835#issuecomment-652159398 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/835 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MjE1OTM5OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-07-01T03:03:51Z | 2020-07-01T03:03:51Z | OWNER | I'm going to add some tests for this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for skipping CSRF checks on API posts 637363686 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 6