issue_comments
11 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "created_at" is on date 2022-01-10 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw · 11 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1009288898 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009288898 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KIbC | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:54:04Z | 2022-01-10T19:54:04Z | OWNER | Having browsed the API reference I think the methods that would benefit from an
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009285627 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009285627 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KHn7 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:49:19Z | 2022-01-10T19:51:25Z | OWNER | Documentation for those two new methods: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/python-api.html#optimizing-index-usage-with-analyze |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009286373 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009286373 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KHzl | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:50:22Z | 2022-01-10T19:50:22Z | OWNER | With respect to #365, I'm now thinking that having the ability to say "... and then run ANALYZE" could be useful for a bunch of Python methods. For example:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009273525 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009273525 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KEq1 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:32:39Z | 2022-01-10T19:32:39Z | OWNER | I'm going to implement the Python library methods based on the prototype: ```diff commit 650f97a08f29a688c530e5f6c9eedc9269ed7bdc Author: Simon Willison swillison@gmail.com Date: Sat Jan 8 13:34:01 2022 -0800
diff --git a/sqlite_utils/db.py b/sqlite_utils/db.py
index dfc4723..1348b4a 100644
--- a/sqlite_utils/db.py
+++ b/sqlite_utils/db.py
@@ -923,6 +923,13 @@ class Database:
"Run a SQLite
class Queryable: def exists(self) -> bool: @@ -2902,6 +2909,10 @@ class Table(Queryable): ) return self
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009272446 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/367#issuecomment-1009272446 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/367 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KEZ- | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:31:08Z | 2022-01-10T19:31:08Z | OWNER | I'm going to implement this in a separate commit from this PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Initial prototype of .analyze() methods 1097041471 | |
1008557414 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364#issuecomment-1008557414 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48HV1m | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T05:36:19Z | 2022-01-10T05:36:19Z | OWNER | That did the trick. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`--batch-size 1` doesn't seem to commit for every item 1095570074 | |
1008556706 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/375#issuecomment-1008556706 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/375 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48HVqi | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T05:33:41Z | 2022-01-10T05:33:41Z | OWNER | I tested the prototype like this:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`sqlite-utils bulk` command 1097251014 | |
1008546573 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364#issuecomment-1008546573 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48HTMN | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T05:05:15Z | 2022-01-10T05:05:15Z | OWNER | Bit nasty but it might work: ```python def try_until(expected): tries = 0 while True: rows = list(Database(db_path)["rows"].rows) if rows == expected: return tries += 1 if tries > 10: assert False, "Expected {}, got {}".format(expected, rows) time.sleep(tries * 0.1)
``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`--batch-size 1` doesn't seem to commit for every item 1095570074 | |
1008545140 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364#issuecomment-1008545140 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48HS10 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T05:01:34Z | 2022-01-10T05:01:34Z | OWNER | Urgh, tests are still failing intermittently - for example: ``` time.sleep(0.4)
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`--batch-size 1` doesn't seem to commit for every item 1095570074 | |
1008537194 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364#issuecomment-1008537194 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48HQ5q | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T04:29:53Z | 2022-01-10T04:31:29Z | OWNER | After a bunch of debugging with I think that's because it is being buffered by this: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/d2a79d200f9071a86027365fa2a576865b71064f/sqlite_utils/cli.py#L759-L770 The buffering is there so that we can sniff the first few bytes to detect if it's a CSV file - added in 99ff0a288c08ec2071139c6031eb880fa9c95310 for #230. So maybe for non-CSV inputs we should disable buffering? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`--batch-size 1` doesn't seem to commit for every item 1095570074 | |
1008526736 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364#issuecomment-1008526736 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48HOWQ | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T04:07:29Z | 2022-01-10T04:07:29Z | OWNER | I think this test is right:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`--batch-size 1` doesn't seem to commit for every item 1095570074 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4