issue_comments
19 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "created_at" is on date 2022-09-15 and reactions = "{"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0}" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw 19
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1248621072 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248621072 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KbHIQ | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:56:09Z | 2022-09-15T20:56:09Z | OWNER | Prototype so far:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248591268 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/486#issuecomment-1248591268 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/486 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Ka_2k | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:36:02Z | 2022-09-15T20:40:03Z | OWNER | I had a big CSV file lying around, I converted it to other formats like this:
Then tested the progress bar like this:
Output:
And for regular JSON:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
progressbar for inserts/upserts of all fileformats, closes #485 1366512990 | |
1248597643 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/485#issuecomment-1248597643 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/485 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KbBaL | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:39:39Z | 2022-09-15T20:39:52Z | OWNER | A note from PR #486: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/486#issuecomment-1248591268_
I decided to land this anyway. If a streaming JSON parser is added later it will start to work. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Progressbar not shown when inserting/upserting jsonlines file 1366423176 | |
1248593835 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/486#issuecomment-1248593835 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/486 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KbAer | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:37:14Z | 2022-09-15T20:37:14Z | OWNER | I'm going to land this anyway. The lack of a streaming JSON parser is a separate issue, I don't think it should block landing this improvement. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
progressbar for inserts/upserts of all fileformats, closes #485 1366512990 | |
1248582147 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/486#issuecomment-1248582147 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/486 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Ka9oD | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:29:17Z | 2022-09-15T20:29:17Z | OWNER | This looks good to me. I need to run some manual tests before merging (it's a good sign that the automated tests pass though). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
progressbar for inserts/upserts of all fileformats, closes #485 1366512990 | |
1248568775 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/486#issuecomment-1248568775 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/486 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Ka6XH | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:16:14Z | 2022-09-15T20:16:14Z | OWNER | https://github.com/actions/setup-python/blob/main/docs/advanced-usage.md#using-the-python-version-input says can set the full version:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
progressbar for inserts/upserts of all fileformats, closes #485 1366512990 | |
1248567323 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/486#issuecomment-1248567323 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/486 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Ka6Ab | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:14:45Z | 2022-09-15T20:14:45Z | OWNER | There's a fix for For the moment looks like pinning to Python 3.10.6 could help. Need to figure out how to do that in GitHub Actions though. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
progressbar for inserts/upserts of all fileformats, closes #485 1366512990 | |
1248565396 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/486#issuecomment-1248565396 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/486 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Ka5iU | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T20:12:50Z | 2022-09-15T20:12:50Z | OWNER | Annoying
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
progressbar for inserts/upserts of all fileformats, closes #485 1366512990 | |
1248522618 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248522618 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KavF6 | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T19:29:20Z | 2022-09-15T19:29:20Z | OWNER | I think refactoring |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248512739 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248512739 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Kasrj | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T19:18:24Z | 2022-09-15T19:21:01Z | OWNER | Why doesn't https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/279#issuecomment-864207841 says:
Maybe I forgot to do that? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248501824 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248501824 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KaqBA | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T19:10:48Z | 2022-09-15T19:10:48Z | OWNER | This feels pretty good:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248484094 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248484094 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Kalr- | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T18:56:31Z | 2022-09-15T18:56:31Z | OWNER | Actually I quite like
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248481303 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248481303 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KalAX | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T18:54:30Z | 2022-09-15T18:55:14Z | OWNER | Maybe this would make more sense as a mechanism where you can say "Use the data in the key called X" - but there's a special option for "figure out that key automatically". The syntax then could be:
Or for automatic detection:
Could also go with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248479485 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248479485 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Kakj9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T18:52:52Z | 2022-09-15T18:53:45Z | OWNER | The most similar option I have at the moment is probably
Those are all bad. Another option: introduce a new explicit format for it. Right now the explicit formats you can use are: So I could add a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248475718 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248475718 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KajpG | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T18:49:05Z | 2022-09-15T18:49:53Z | OWNER | Here's how I used my prototype to build that Gist:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248474806 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489#issuecomment-1248474806 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Kaja2 | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T18:48:09Z | 2022-09-15T18:48:09Z | OWNER | Built a prototype of this that works really well:
One problem though: right now, if you do this So I probably need some kind of opt-in mechanism for this. And I need a good name for it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects 1374939463 | |
1248290151 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1810#issuecomment-1248290151 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1810 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5KZ2Vn | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T15:51:04Z | 2022-09-15T15:51:25Z | OWNER | I could prototype this idea as a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Featured table(s) on the homepage 1374626873 | |
1248289857 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1810#issuecomment-1248289857 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1810 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5KZ2RB | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T15:50:46Z | 2022-09-15T15:50:46Z | OWNER | Idea: allow the user to specify one or more featured tables. Each table is then shown as a summary on the homepage - with the total number of rows and the first 5 rows. If the table has search configured there's a search box too. If the instance has only one database with only one table (excluding hidden tables) it gets featured automatically perhaps (maybe with a way to opt-out of that if you want to). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Featured table(s) on the homepage 1374626873 | |
1248187089 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1810#issuecomment-1248187089 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1810 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5KZdLR | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-15T14:31:36Z | 2022-09-15T14:31:36Z | OWNER | Twitter conversation that inspired this issue: https://twitter.com/psychemedia/status/1570410108785684481 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Featured table(s) on the homepage 1374626873 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4