issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "created_at" is on date 2022-09-23 and reactions = "{"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0}" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw 5
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1256662785 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256662785 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1817 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K5ycB | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-23T20:53:21Z | 2022-09-23T20:53:21Z | OWNER | Maybe the signature for that method should be:
Those would then be passed when specific views call So yet another change that's blocked on fixing that long-running weird piece of technical debt: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1518 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Expose `sql` and `params` arguments to various plugin hooks 1384273985 | |
1256659788 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256659788 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1817 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K5xtM | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-23T20:49:22Z | 2022-09-23T20:49:22Z | OWNER | Implementation challenge: all four of those hooks are called inside the So I would have to pull the Might be an opportunity to clean up this hack: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Expose `sql` and `params` arguments to various plugin hooks 1384273985 | |
1256652548 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256652548 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1817 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K5v8E | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-23T20:41:32Z | 2022-09-23T20:41:32Z | OWNER | Which plugin hooks should take
And maybe these:
I'll start by implementing the first set, then I'll think further about those "maybes". |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Expose `sql` and `params` arguments to various plugin hooks 1384273985 | |
1256650449 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256650449 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1817 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K5vbR | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-23T20:38:53Z | 2022-09-23T20:38:53Z | OWNER | I've wanted something like this in the past too. I think the thing to do here might be to add While I'm working on this: https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.62/plugin_hooks.html#register-output-renderer-datasette output renderer functions take |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Expose `sql` and `params` arguments to various plugin hooks 1384273985 | |
1256428818 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/490#issuecomment-1256428818 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/490 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5K45US | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-23T16:37:58Z | 2022-09-23T16:38:35Z | OWNER | It should be possible to achieve this with the Given an example like this in r = re.compile(r'^(?P<datetime>\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}):(?P<log>.*)', re.MULTILINE) def convert(text):
return [m.groupdict() for m in r.finditer(text)]
"
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to insert multi-line files 1382457780 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 2