issue_comments
10 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "created_at" is on date 2022-12-06 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date)
user 1
- simonw · 10 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1339968514 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1931#issuecomment-1339968514 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1931 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3kwC | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T20:28:47Z | 2022-12-06T20:28:47Z | OWNER | Should the I think it should. Since this is small enough to happily fit in Python memory (thanks to the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
/db/table/-/upsert 1473814539 | |
1339952692 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855#issuecomment-1339952692 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1855 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3g40 | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T20:15:50Z | 2022-12-06T20:16:00Z | OWNER | That commit there https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/6da17d5529773dfe41b53ed4ce5a6ecb46ed2457 (which will be squash-merged in a PR later on) made it so that I needed that mechanism to write a test that exercised different API permissions. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`datasette create-token` ability to create tokens with a reduced set of permissions 1423336089 | |
1339911152 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1931#issuecomment-1339911152 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1931 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3Wvw | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T19:38:12Z | 2022-12-06T19:38:12Z | OWNER | Documentation: https://datasette--1931.org.readthedocs.build/en/1931/json_api.html#upserting-rows |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
/db/table/-/upsert 1473814539 | |
1339910494 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1927#issuecomment-1339910494 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3Wle | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T19:37:39Z | 2022-12-06T19:37:39Z | OWNER | I'll finish this after I land: - #1931 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API 1473411197 | |
1339909159 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1929#issuecomment-1339909159 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1929 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3WQn | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T19:36:23Z | 2022-12-06T19:36:23Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Incorrect link from the API explorer to the JSON API documentation 1473659191 | ||
1339871933 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1929#issuecomment-1339871933 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1929 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3NK9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T19:23:48Z | 2022-12-06T19:24:17Z | OWNER | I can do that on this page: https://readthedocs.org/projects/datasette/versions/?version_filter=1.0 I'm making them both active and hidden: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Incorrect link from the API explorer to the JSON API documentation 1473659191 | |
1339867570 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1929#issuecomment-1339867570 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1929 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3MGy | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T19:22:47Z | 2022-12-06T19:22:47Z | OWNER | Yeah I should deploy the docs for the alpha versions (the intention is that the docs exactly match the release you are using), thanks for spotting that. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Incorrect link from the API explorer to the JSON API documentation 1473659191 | |
1339834918 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516#issuecomment-1339834918 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5P3EIm | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T19:00:18Z | 2022-12-06T19:00:35Z | OWNER | Right now the command produces no output at all. Maybe a Is there a better name than |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature request: output number of ignored/replaced rows for insert command 1479914599 | |
1339784569 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1931#issuecomment-1339784569 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1931 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P2315 | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T18:16:15Z | 2022-12-06T18:17:56Z | OWNER | Just noticed the insert API returns UPDATE: no it did that already, it was just the documentation that was wrong. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
/db/table/-/upsert 1473814539 | |
1339768422 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1931#issuecomment-1339768422 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1931 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P2z5m | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T18:04:59Z | 2022-12-06T18:04:59Z | OWNER | I realized this API should require both the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
/db/table/-/upsert 1473814539 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 5