issue_comments
12 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "created_at" is on date 2023-09-08 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw · 12 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1711057080 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2180#issuecomment-1711057080 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2180 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l_Ki4 | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T04:28:03Z | 2023-09-08T04:28:03Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plugin hook: `actors_from_ids()` 1886791100 | ||
1711054840 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2181#issuecomment-1711054840 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2181 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l_J_4 | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T04:23:47Z | 2023-09-08T04:23:47Z | OWNER | I've implemented this hook once now in: - https://github.com/datasette/datasette-remote-actors And built and tested a debug tool for it in: - https://github.com/datasette/datasette-debug-actors-from-ids I'm now confident in the design of this plugin hook, I'm going to land it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
actors_from_ids plugin hook and datasette.actors_from_ids() method 1886812002 | |
1711054624 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2180#issuecomment-1711054624 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2180 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l_J8g | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T04:23:23Z | 2023-09-08T04:23:23Z | OWNER | I've implemented this hook once now in: - https://github.com/datasette/datasette-remote-actors And built and tested a debug tool for it in: - https://github.com/datasette/datasette-debug-actors-from-ids I'm now confident in the design of this plugin hook, I'm going to land it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plugin hook: `actors_from_ids()` 1886791100 | |
1711028355 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2180#issuecomment-1711028355 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2180 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l_DiD | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T03:36:02Z | 2023-09-08T03:36:02Z | OWNER | I shipped the first version of When I land this plugin in a Datasette release I need to update that repo to depend on the new alpha. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plugin hook: `actors_from_ids()` 1886791100 | |
1710969448 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2181#issuecomment-1710969448 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2181 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l-1Jo | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T01:53:27Z | 2023-09-08T01:53:27Z | OWNER | Documentation preview: - https://datasette--2181.org.readthedocs.build/en/2181/internals.html#await-actors-from-ids-actor-ids - https://datasette--2181.org.readthedocs.build/en/2181/plugin_hooks.html#plugin-hook-actors-from-ids |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
actors_from_ids plugin hook and datasette.actors_from_ids() method 1886812002 | |
1710969339 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2180#issuecomment-1710969339 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2180 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l-1H7 | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T01:53:16Z | 2023-09-08T01:53:16Z | OWNER | Documentation preview: - https://datasette--2181.org.readthedocs.build/en/2181/internals.html#await-actors-from-ids-actor-ids - https://datasette--2181.org.readthedocs.build/en/2181/plugin_hooks.html#plugin-hook-actors-from-ids |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plugin hook: `actors_from_ids()` 1886791100 | |
1710947637 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2180#issuecomment-1710947637 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2180 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5l-v01 | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T01:17:28Z | 2023-09-08T01:17:28Z | OWNER | I think this is both a plugin hook and a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plugin hook: `actors_from_ids()` 1886791100 | |
1710935270 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710935270 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-szm | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:55:30Z | 2023-09-08T00:55:30Z | OWNER | Yes! That recreated the bug: ```
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
1710934448 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710934448 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-smw | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:54:03Z | 2023-09-08T00:54:03Z | OWNER | Oh! Maybe the row ID preservation here is a coincidence because the tables are created from scratch and count 1, 2, 3. If I delete a row from the table and then insert some more - breaking the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
1710933716 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710933716 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-sbU | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:52:42Z | 2023-09-08T00:52:42Z | OWNER | I just noticed that the table where I encountered this bug wasn't actually a The reason the But I tried this test and it passed, too:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
1710931605 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710931605 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-r6V | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:49:02Z | 2023-09-08T00:49:02Z | OWNER | I tried bumping that up to 10,000 rows instead of just 3 but the test still passed. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 | |
1710930934 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592#issuecomment-1710930934 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/592 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5l-rv2 | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-08T00:47:57Z | 2023-09-08T00:47:57Z | OWNER | That's odd, I wrote a test for this just now and it passes already:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`table.transform()` should preserve `rowid` values 1886771493 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3