issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 1108671952 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Scripted exports · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1331694246 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1605#issuecomment-1331694246 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5PYAqm | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-30T06:18:41Z | 2022-11-30T06:18:41Z | OWNER | Those sounds to me like they should be promoted to documented, supported internals. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Scripted exports 1108671952 | |
1328169472 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1605#issuecomment-1328169472 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5PKkIA | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-27T04:32:14Z | 2022-11-27T04:32:14Z | OWNER | @eyeseast I started work on that plugin: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-export |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Scripted exports 1108671952 | |
1072907200 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1605#issuecomment-1072907200 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_80PA | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-19T00:52:54Z | 2022-03-19T00:53:45Z | OWNER | Had a thought about the implementation of this: it could make a really neat plugin. Something like
And the command would then:
All of that HTML parsing may be over-complicating things. It could alternatively accept options for which pages you want to export:
Or a really wild option: it could allow you to define the paths you want to export using a SQL query:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Scripted exports 1108671952 | |
1018766727 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1605#issuecomment-1018766727 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48uSWH | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-21T18:41:21Z | 2022-01-21T18:42:03Z | OWNER | Yeah I think this all hinges on: - #1101 Also this comment about streaming full JSON arrays (not just newline-delimited) using this trick: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1356#issuecomment-1017016553 I'm about ready to figure these out, as with so much it's still a little bit blocked on the refactor stuff from: - #1518 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Scripted exports 1108671952 | |
1016977725 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1605#issuecomment-1016977725 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48ndk9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-19T23:55:08Z | 2022-01-19T23:55:08Z | OWNER | Oh that's interesting. I was thinking about this from a slightly different angle recently - pondering what a static site generator built on top of Datasette might look like. Just a sketch at the moment, but I was imagining a YAML configuration file with a SQL query that returns a list of paths - then a tool that runs that query and uses the equivalent of I think these two ideas can probably be merged. I'd love to know more about how you are solving this right now! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Scripted exports 1108671952 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1