issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 1125297737, "updated_at" is on date 2022-02-08 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1030904948 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402#issuecomment-1030904948 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49clx0 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-06T20:09:42Z | 2022-02-08T07:40:44Z | OWNER | I think this is the code that needs to become aware of this system: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/fea8c9bcc509bcae75e99ae8870f520103b9aa58/sqlite_utils/db.py#L2453-L2469 There's an earlier branch that runs for upserts which needs to be modified too: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/fea8c9bcc509bcae75e99ae8870f520103b9aa58/sqlite_utils/db.py#L2417-L2440 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism 1125297737 | |
1030902102 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402#issuecomment-1030902102 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49clFW | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-06T19:53:34Z | 2022-02-08T07:40:34Z | OWNER | I like the idea that the contract for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism 1125297737 | |
1032296717 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402#issuecomment-1032296717 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49h5kN | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-08T07:35:46Z | 2022-02-08T07:35:46Z | OWNER | I'm going to write the documentation for this first, before the implementation, so I can see if it explains cleanly enough that the design appears to be sound. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism 1125297737 | |
1032294365 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402#issuecomment-1032294365 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49h4_d | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-08T07:32:09Z | 2022-02-08T07:34:41Z | OWNER | I have an idea for how that third option could work - the one that creates a new column using values from the existing ones:
Then you could do this:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism 1125297737 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1