issue_comments
11 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 1334628400 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count · 11 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1214416491 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214416491 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYoZr | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T17:07:34Z | 2022-08-14T17:07:34Z | OWNER | Tested that with:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214414471 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214414471 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYn6H | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:55:40Z | 2022-08-14T16:55:40Z | OWNER | Here's the start of the man page for SYNOPSIS
gcloud run deploy [[SERVICE] --namespace=NAMESPACE] [--args=[ARG,...]]
[--async] [--command=[COMMAND,...]] [--concurrency=CONCURRENCY]
[--cpu=CPU] [--ingress=INGRESS; default="all"]
[--max-instances=MAX_INSTANCES] [--memory=MEMORY]
[--min-instances=MIN_INSTANCES]
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214414320 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214414320 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYn3w | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:54:32Z | 2022-08-14T16:54:32Z | OWNER | (I deleted my |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214414013 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214414013 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYny9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:52:14Z | 2022-08-14T16:52:14Z | OWNER | Just tried this instead, and it still worked and deployed OK:
@fgregg I'm not able to replicate your deployment failure I'm afraid. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214413750 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214413750 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYnu2 | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:50:08Z | 2022-08-14T16:50:08Z | OWNER | Just spotted this in the failing Actions workflow:
I tried that locally too but the deploy still succeeds. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214413534 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214413534 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYnre | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:48:28Z | 2022-08-14T16:48:28Z | OWNER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214413419 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214413419 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYnpr | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:47:27Z | 2022-08-14T16:47:27Z | OWNER | Maybe I need to upgrade:
Your current Google Cloud CLI version is: 378.0.0 You will be upgraded to version: 397.0.0 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ These components will be updated. │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬────────────┬──────────┤ │ Name │ Version │ Size │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────────┼──────────┤ │ BigQuery Command Line Tool │ 2.0.75 │ 1.6 MiB │ │ BigQuery Command Line Tool (Platform Specific) │ 2.0.75 │ < 1 MiB │ │ Cloud Storage Command Line Tool │ 5.11 │ 15.5 MiB │ │ Cloud Storage Command Line Tool (Platform Specific) │ 5.11 │ < 1 MiB │ │ Google Cloud CLI Core Libraries │ 2022.08.05 │ 24.3 MiB │ │ Google Cloud CLI Core Libraries (Platform Specific) │ 2022.08.05 │ < 1 MiB │ │ anthoscli │ 0.2.28 │ 48.0 MiB │ │ gcloud Alpha Commands │ 2022.08.05 │ < 1 MiB │ │ gcloud cli dependencies │ 2022.07.29 │ 11.2 MiB │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴────────────┴──────────┘ A lot has changed since your last upgrade. For the latest full release notes,
please visit:
https://cloud.google.com/sdk/release_notes
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214413161 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214413161 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYnlp | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:45:36Z | 2022-08-14T16:45:36Z | OWNER | Tried duplicating this error locally but the following command succeeded when I expected it to fail:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214412382 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214412382 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYnZe | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:40:02Z | 2022-08-14T16:40:02Z | OWNER | Here's the relevant part of the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214412135 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214412135 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYnVn | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:38:08Z | 2022-08-14T16:38:08Z | OWNER | Actually I disagree that Datasette isn't setup to make use of container scaling: part of the idea behind the Baked Data pattern is that you can scale to handle effectively unlimited traffic by running multiple copies of your application, each with their own duplicate copy of the database. So I'm going to default maxScale to 10 and still let people customize it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1214411951 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214411951 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYnSv | simonw 9599 | 2022-08-14T16:36:55Z | 2022-08-14T16:36:55Z | OWNER | I'm going to default maxscale to 2 but provide an extra command line option for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1