issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and issue = 1618249044 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Consider a `strict_templates` setting · 2 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1463112173 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2038#issuecomment-1463112173 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2038 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5XNVHt | simonw 9599 | 2023-03-10T02:11:06Z | 2023-03-10T02:11:06Z | OWNER | Here's an example of something that would break: Because |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Consider a `strict_templates` setting 1618249044 | |
| 1463110978 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2038#issuecomment-1463110978 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2038 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5XNU1C | simonw 9599 | 2023-03-10T02:09:41Z | 2023-03-10T02:09:41Z | OWNER | I'm torn on this. It's useful for me right now for refactoring, but I feel like it should be a permanent thing, not a setting - or it should default to on and people should turn it off, but who would ever do that? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Consider a `strict_templates` setting 1618249044 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1