issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 272391665 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Switch to ujson · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 504883688 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/48#issuecomment-504883688 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/48 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDg4MzY4OA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-06-24T06:57:43Z | 2019-06-24T06:57:43Z | OWNER | I've seen no evidence that JSON handling is even close to being a performance bottleneck, so wontfix. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Switch to ujson 272391665 | |
| 379556637 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/48#issuecomment-379556637 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/48 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3OTU1NjYzNw== | simonw 9599 | 2018-04-08T14:56:52Z | 2018-04-08T14:56:52Z | OWNER | It would be useful to have a microbenchmark in place to help understand how much of a performance benefit this would actually provide. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Switch to ujson 272391665 | |
| 343239062 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/48#issuecomment-343239062 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/48 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MzIzOTA2Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2017-11-09T18:01:46Z | 2017-11-09T18:01:46Z | OWNER | This looks promising: https://github.com/esnme/ultrajson/issues/124#issuecomment-323882878 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Switch to ujson 272391665 | |
| 343168796 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/48#issuecomment-343168796 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/48 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MzE2ODc5Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2017-11-09T14:22:21Z | 2017-11-09T14:22:21Z | OWNER | Won't fix: ujson is not compatible with the custom JSON encoder I'm using here: https://github.com/simonw/immutabase/blob/b2dee11fcd989d9e2a7bf4de1e23dbc320c05013/immutabase/app.py#L401-L416 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Switch to ujson 272391665 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1