issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 316444720 and "updated_at" is on date 2018-06-16 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Option to expose expanded foreign keys in JSON/CSV · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
397842194 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/233#issuecomment-397842194 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/233 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5Nzg0MjE5NA== | simonw 9599 | 2018-06-16T22:26:21Z | 2018-06-16T22:26:21Z | OWNER | Some demos:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to expose expanded foreign keys in JSON/CSV 316444720 | |
397840676 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/233#issuecomment-397840676 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/233 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5Nzg0MDY3Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2018-06-16T21:49:50Z | 2018-06-16T21:49:50Z | OWNER | For the moment I'm going with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to expose expanded foreign keys in JSON/CSV 316444720 | |
397839583 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/233#issuecomment-397839583 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/233 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NzgzOTU4Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2018-06-16T21:23:14Z | 2018-06-16T21:23:44Z | OWNER | I'm a bit torn on naming - choices are:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to expose expanded foreign keys in JSON/CSV 316444720 | |
397839482 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/233#issuecomment-397839482 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/233 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NzgzOTQ4Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2018-06-16T21:21:03Z | 2018-06-16T21:21:03Z | OWNER | Should facets always have their labels expanded or should they also obey the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to expose expanded foreign keys in JSON/CSV 316444720 | |
397824991 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/233#issuecomment-397824991 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/233 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NzgyNDk5MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2018-06-16T16:50:31Z | 2018-06-16T16:50:42Z | OWNER | I'm going to support Related: 7e0caa1e62607c6579101cc0e62bec8899013715 where I added a new |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to expose expanded foreign keys in JSON/CSV 316444720 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1