issue_comments
10 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 431800286 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json · 10 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
488564761 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-488564761 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODU2NDc2MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-02T06:24:49Z | 2019-05-03T00:07:16Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/facet-refactor-2 is almost ready to merge now. The remaining things to do are listed as TODOs there:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
488564891 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-488564891 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4ODU2NDg5MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-02T06:25:41Z | 2019-05-02T06:25:41Z | OWNER | It would be neat to ship at least one additional face with this work - probably either |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
482865424 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-482865424 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4Mjg2NTQyNA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-13T18:56:25Z | 2019-04-13T19:42:08Z | OWNER | I think there's a
Could even have a facet against a numerical column which loads the entire set of column values into numpy or pandas and calculates complex statistics facets in memory . There’s actually a lot of potential for Datasette plugins that load several MBs of data and analyze using other Python libraries. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
482864457 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-482864457 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4Mjg2NDQ1Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-13T18:51:44Z | 2019-04-13T18:57:51Z | OWNER | A facet needs to:
- given a sql query and a list of configs, return a list of buckets
- Know how to generate URLs for selecting and deselecting a filter (along with underlying filter application sql logic)
- Tell if a specific filter is currently selected or not
- Set a time limit and report if it times out
- Generate human readable labels
- In some cases: expand foreign keys - which means they need access to foreign key information - just the name of the table and the name of the column is enough to call |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
482864837 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-482864837 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4Mjg2NDgzNw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-13T18:53:43Z | 2019-04-13T18:53:43Z | OWNER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
482627099 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-482627099 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MjYyNzA5OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-12T15:54:41Z | 2019-04-12T15:54:41Z | OWNER | Bonus idea: since we are having a Facet abstraction we should allow additional facet type apps to be registered using a plugin. Fun idea for a (very inefficient) demo plugin: facet-by-emoji! Would work by counting all emoji in text fields using a horrible slow full-scan regular expression, then would apply selected emoji facets using a LIKE query. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
482626534 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-482626534 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MjYyNjUzNA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-12T15:52:53Z | 2019-04-12T15:52:53Z | OWNER | I just realized: a key part of faceting is being able to correctly apply the facet (and know that it has been applied). Existing facets are exact match only, so they can be applied and detected with ?foo=bar More advanced facets like _facet_array and _facet_m2m will need different ways of applying themselves. This needs to be bundled up in the new Facet abstraction somehow. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
481957313 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-481957313 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTk1NzMxMw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-11T04:07:00Z | 2019-04-11T04:07:40Z | OWNER | This means the So any advanced facets are represented here as a dictionary with a single key - the type - that maps to the options. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
481957014 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-481957014 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTk1NzAxNA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-11T04:05:07Z | 2019-04-11T04:05:07Z | OWNER | OK, I have a plan:
Options here can be one of the following:
If the table name itself contains a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 | |
481940539 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-481940539 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTk0MDUzOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-04-11T02:26:43Z | 2019-04-11T02:26:43Z | OWNER | I quite like the Solr idea. It could look like this for Datasette:
I don't like the need to say |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json 431800286 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1