issue_comments
9 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and issue = 519613116 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Refactor TableView.data() method · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
552253893 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-552253893 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjI1Mzg5Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-11T00:46:42Z | 2021-12-18T01:41:47Z | OWNER | As noted in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/621#issuecomment-552253208 a common pattern in this method is blocks of code that append new items to the Code that fits this pattern:
The keyset pagination code modifies [UPDATE December 2021 - this comment became the basis for a new |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
991755013 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-991755013 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47HPsF | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-11T19:17:11Z | 2021-12-11T19:17:11Z | OWNER | This work is now happening in #1518 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
555111571 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-555111571 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTExMTU3MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-18T17:04:56Z | 2019-11-18T17:04:56Z | OWNER | I made some comments on an annotated version of this method a few days ago: https://gist.github.com/simonw/66aca058195d77bae5f614ef73352eb5 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
552254753 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-552254753 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjI1NDc1Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-11T00:54:51Z | 2019-11-11T00:54:51Z | OWNER | That |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
551349770 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-551349770 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MTM0OTc3MA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-08T01:59:20Z | 2019-11-11T00:53:42Z | OWNER | This is what the code does:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
552254238 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-552254238 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjI1NDIzOA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-11T00:49:57Z | 2019-11-11T00:51:35Z | OWNER | I experimented with a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
552141417 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-552141417 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjE0MTQxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-09T21:58:40Z | 2019-11-09T21:58:40Z | OWNER | The function that builds the query could go in a new I can design it to only take simple arguments (the table name, list of columns, list of primary keys and a list of key/value tuples from the query string). This will make it really easy to test (and means it won't need to be async since it won't have to use queries to retrieve those values). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
551349885 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-551349885 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MTM0OTg4NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-08T01:59:43Z | 2019-11-08T02:00:52Z | OWNER | A clean starting point would be to refactor out the "take a table and a bunch of querystring parameters and turn them into a SQL query" portion. Added bonus to this: I've long wanted to be able to apply the various trimmings of the TableView (like faceting and foreign key expansion) to other arbitrary SQL queries. Splitting out the code that builds the SELECT query will go a long way to making that a reality. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 | |
551349022 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-551349022 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MTM0OTAyMg== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-08T01:56:28Z | 2019-11-08T01:56:28Z | OWNER | Here's the current monstrosity: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/f9c146b893856a48afa810ebcce1714f30d0d3a2/datasette/views/table.py#L210-L780 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor TableView.data() method 519613116 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1