issue_comments

Table actions

6 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 573583971 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date)

user 1

  • simonw · 6 ✖

issue 1

  • "Templates considered" comment broken in >=0.35 · 6 ✖

author_association 1

  • OWNER · 6 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
609469440 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/689#issuecomment-609469440 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/689 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTQ2OTQ0MA== simonw 9599 2020-04-05T19:28:59Z 2020-04-05T19:28:59Z OWNER

So I think the fix is to move the "select_templates": select_templates context setting bit to here instead:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e89b0ef2f9ae89eb3bde83b694f21452ea4858da/datasette/views/base.py#L75-L83

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 "Templates considered" comment broken in >=0.35 573583971  
609469318 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/689#issuecomment-609469318 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/689 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTQ2OTMxOA== simonw 9599 2020-04-05T19:28:14Z 2020-04-05T19:28:14Z OWNER

Here's why: the BaseView.render() method is running jinja_env.select_template() now here:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e89b0ef2f9ae89eb3bde83b694f21452ea4858da/datasette/views/base.py#L75-L88

Which means this logic is always called with a template, not a list of strings:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e89b0ef2f9ae89eb3bde83b694f21452ea4858da/datasette/app.py#L555-L571

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 "Templates considered" comment broken in >=0.35 573583971  
609468485 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/689#issuecomment-609468485 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/689 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTQ2ODQ4NQ== simonw 9599 2020-04-05T19:22:31Z 2020-04-05T19:22:31Z OWNER

``` $ git bisect start master 0.34 Bisecting: 32 revisions left to test after this (roughly 5 steps) [dc80e779a2e708b2685fc641df99e6aae9ad6f97] Handle scope path if it is a string $ git bisect run python check_templates_considered.py running python check_templates_considered.py Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError Bisecting: 15 revisions left to test after this (roughly 4 steps) [7c6a9c35299f251f9abfb03fd8e85143e4361709] Better tests for prepare_connection() plugin hook, refs #678 running python check_templates_considered.py Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError Bisecting: 7 revisions left to test after this (roughly 3 steps) [0091dfe3e5a3db94af8881038d3f1b8312bb857d] More reliable tie-break ordering for facet results running python check_templates_considered.py Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError Bisecting: 3 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps) [ce12244037b60ba0202c814871218c1dab38d729] Release notes for 0.35 running python check_templates_considered.py Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError Bisecting: 1 revision left to test after this (roughly 1 step) [70b915fb4bc214f9d064179f87671f8a378aa127] Datasette.render_template() method, closes #577 running python check_templates_considered.py Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [286ed286b68793532c2a38436a08343b45cfbc91] geojson-to-sqlite running python check_templates_considered.py 70b915fb4bc214f9d064179f87671f8a378aa127 is the first bad commit commit 70b915fb4bc214f9d064179f87671f8a378aa127 Author: Simon Willison swillison@gmail.com Date: Tue Feb 4 12:26:17 2020 -0800

Datasette.render_template() method, closes #577

Pull request #664.

:040000 040000 def9e31252e056845609de36c66d4320dd0c47f8 da19b7f8c26d50a4c05e5a7f05220b968429725c M datasette bisect run success ``` It was 70b915fb4bc214f9d064179f87671f8a378aa127 - the same bad commit that caused #716!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 "Templates considered" comment broken in >=0.35 573583971  
609468180 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/689#issuecomment-609468180 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/689 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTQ2ODE4MA== simonw 9599 2020-04-05T19:20:33Z 2020-04-05T19:20:33Z OWNER

git bisect start master 0.34 git bisect run python check_templates_considered.py

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 "Templates considered" comment broken in >=0.35 573583971  
609467876 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/689#issuecomment-609467876 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/689 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTQ2Nzg3Ng== simonw 9599 2020-04-05T19:18:36Z 2020-04-05T19:18:36Z OWNER

Just need the one checking script to run with bisect this time:

check_templates_considered.py

```python import asyncio import pathlib from datasette.app import Datasette import httpx

async def run_check(): ds = Datasette([]) async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=ds.app()) as client: response = await client.get("http://localhost/") assert 200 == response.status_code assert "Templates considered" in response.text

if name == "main": loop = asyncio.get_event_loop() loop.run_until_complete(run_check()) ```

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 "Templates considered" comment broken in >=0.35 573583971  
609467523 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/689#issuecomment-609467523 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/689 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTQ2NzUyMw== simonw 9599 2020-04-05T19:16:13Z 2020-04-05T19:16:13Z OWNER

I'm going to debug this using git bisect run - the same technique I used in #716 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/716#issuecomment-609453886

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 "Templates considered" comment broken in >=0.35 573583971  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);