issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 634663505 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date)
issue 1
- Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
740385032 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-740385032 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0MDM4NTAzMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-08T05:26:09Z | 2020-12-08T05:26:16Z | OWNER | Sure! It's a bit of a fiddle one - I've not found an approach that I like, but I also haven't thought about it since June. I'd love to see what you come up with! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640673405 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640673405 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MzQwNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:41:55Z | 2020-06-08T14:41:55Z | OWNER | I want to be able to display the HTTP path and verb - |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640673138 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640673138 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MzEzOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:41:24Z | 2020-06-08T14:41:24Z | OWNER | I could reuse that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640672540 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640672540 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MjU0MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:40:22Z | 2020-06-08T14:40:22Z | OWNER | Here's the current tracer mechanism. Note that it captures a stacktrace (which is expensive) - but only if the tracer system has been enabled for a request. For permissions checks I want to ALWAYS track those calls, not just on requests that have opted in. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640671398 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640671398 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MTM5OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:38:20Z | 2020-06-08T14:38:20Z | OWNER | But |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640671241 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640671241 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MTI0MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:38:04Z | 2020-06-08T14:38:04Z | OWNER | Alternative to a correlation ID would be to use the existing It could even start logging SQL queries to an in-memory deque too, so a debug tool could show you queries executed by other requests! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640656143 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640656143 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY1NjE0Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:25:48Z | 2020-06-08T14:26:45Z | OWNER | Will we need a request correlation ID for this? Multiple asyncio threads can write things to the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1