home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

7 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 712260429 and "updated_at" is on date 2020-12-31 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • simonw 7

issue 1

  • JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy · 7 ✖

author_association 1

  • OWNER · 7 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
753221646 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753221646 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIyMTY0Ng== simonw 9599 2020-12-31T22:58:47Z 2020-12-31T22:58:47Z OWNER

https://github.com/mishoo/UglifyJS/issues/1905#issuecomment-300485490 says:

sourceMappingURL aren't added by default in 3.x due to one of the feature requests not to - some users are putting them within HTTP response headers instead.

So the command line for that would be:

js $ uglifyjs main.js -cmo main.min.js --source-map url=main.min.js.map

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
753219521 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753219521 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxOTUyMQ== simonw 9599 2020-12-31T22:39:52Z 2020-12-31T22:39:52Z OWNER

For inlining the plugins.min.js file into the Jinja templates I could use the trick described here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/41404611 - which adds a {{ include_file('file.txt') }} function to Jinja.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
753219407 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753219407 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxOTQwNw== simonw 9599 2020-12-31T22:38:45Z 2020-12-31T22:39:10Z OWNER

You'll be able to add JavaScript plugins using a bunch of different mechanisms:

  • In a custom template, dropping the code in to a <script> block
  • A bookmarklet that injects an extra script (I'm really excited to try this out)
  • A separate script.js file that's loaded into Datasette using the "extra_js_urls" metadata option, documented here: https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/custom_templates.html#custom-css-and-javascript
  • A plugin you can install, like datasette-vega or datasette-cluster-map - since plugins can bundle their own script files that then get loaded on pages via this hook: https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#extra-js-urls-template-database-table-columns-view-name-request-datasette
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 1,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
753217917 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753217917 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNzkxNw== simonw 9599 2020-12-31T22:23:29Z 2020-12-31T22:23:36Z OWNER

If I'm going to do that, it would be good if subsequent plugins that register against the load event are executed straight away. That's a bit of a weird edge-case in plugin world - it would involve the bulkier code that gets loaded redefining how datasette.plugins.register works to special-case the 'load' hook.

Maybe the tiny bootstrap code could define a datasette.plugins.onload(callbackFunction) method which gets upgraded later into something that fires straight away? Would add more bytes though.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
753217714 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753217714 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNzcxNA== simonw 9599 2020-12-31T22:21:33Z 2020-12-31T22:21:33Z OWNER

Eventually I'd like to provide a whole bunch of other datasette.X utility functions that plugins can use - things like datasette.addTabbedContentPane() or similar.

But I don't want to inline those into the page.

So... I think the basic plugin system remains inline - maybe from an inlined file called plugins-bootstrap.js. Then a separate plugins.js contains the rest of the API functionality.

If a plugin wants to take advantage of those APIs, maybe it registers itself using datasette.plugins.register('load', () => ...) - that load hook can then be fired once the bulkier plugin code has been loaded.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
753215761 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753215761 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNTc2MQ== simonw 9599 2020-12-31T22:07:31Z 2020-12-31T22:07:31Z OWNER

I think I need to keep the mechanism whereby a plugin can return undefined in order to indicate that it has nothing to say for that specific item - that's borrowed from Pluggy and I've used it a bunch in my Python plugins. That makes the code a bit longer.

I'll write some example plugins to help me decide if the filtering-out-of-undefined mechanism is needed or not.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
753215545 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753215545 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzIxNTU0NQ== simonw 9599 2020-12-31T22:05:41Z 2020-12-31T22:05:41Z OWNER

Using object destructuring like that is a great idea. I'm going to play with your version - it's delightfully succinct.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 68.017ms · About: github-to-sqlite