issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 722738988 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- How should datasette.client interact with base_url · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
719959754 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-719959754 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxOTk1OTc1NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-31T16:56:35Z | 2020-10-31T16:56:35Z | OWNER | 1041 can also benefit from the string subclass that shows that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
712962517 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-712962517 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMjk2MjUxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-20T16:09:12Z | 2020-10-20T16:09:12Z | OWNER | That Maybe |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
712959034 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-712959034 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMjk1OTAzNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-20T16:03:33Z | 2020-10-20T16:03:55Z | OWNER | Reconsidering this: I think the The clincher on this is when I went to add a section to the But there's a problem: to handle table name escaping users are likely to want to use
This risks adding the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
712607227 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-712607227 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMjYwNzIyNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-20T05:46:44Z | 2020-10-20T05:46:44Z | OWNER | We have a solution for this now: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
709636372 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-709636372 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwOTYzNjM3Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-15T23:09:34Z | 2020-10-15T23:09:34Z | OWNER | I'm inclined to say that internal requests should ignore The one catch here is plugins that might want to proxy the current incoming URL for some reason - where that incoming Actually those should be fine - because it will have been stripped off earlier: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1