issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 763361458 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- "Stream all rows" is not at all obvious · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
744576894 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1142#issuecomment-744576894 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1142 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDU3Njg5NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-14T17:03:13Z | 2020-12-14T17:03:13Z | OWNER | I'm not sure about the radio boxes for JSON, just because you can't right-click on a radio box and copy it to your clipboard like you can with links. Worth trying it out though. The radio boxes for that CSV option are definitely the right way to go. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
"Stream all rows" is not at all obvious 763361458 | |
744563209 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1142#issuecomment-744563209 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1142 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDU2MzIwOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-14T16:41:11Z | 2020-12-14T16:41:11Z | OWNER | To check out and start the server:
And to run the tests:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
"Stream all rows" is not at all obvious 763361458 | |
744251252 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1142#issuecomment-744251252 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1142 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDI1MTI1Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-14T07:56:38Z | 2020-12-14T07:56:38Z | OWNER | That's a really solid design for this! I'd be very happy to review a pull request - you should be able to implement this with just template edits and some CSS changes I think. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
"Stream all rows" is not at all obvious 763361458 | |
743913004 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1142#issuecomment-743913004 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1142 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0MzkxMzAwNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-12T22:17:46Z | 2020-12-12T22:17:46Z | OWNER | You're actually choosing between two options here: the 100 rows you can see on the screen, or the x,000 rows that match the current query. Maybe a radio box would be more obvious? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
"Stream all rows" is not at all obvious 763361458 | |
743912875 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1142#issuecomment-743912875 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1142 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0MzkxMjg3NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-12T22:16:38Z | 2020-12-12T22:16:38Z | OWNER | Yeah, maybe with the number of rows to make it completely clear. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
"Stream all rows" is not at all obvious 763361458 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1