issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and issue = 777677671 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Prettier package not actually being cached · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 753657180 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1169#issuecomment-753657180 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1169 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzY1NzE4MA== | simonw 9599 | 2021-01-03T18:23:30Z | 2021-01-03T18:23:30Z | OWNER | Also welcome in that PR would be a bit of documentation for contributors, see #1167 - but no problem if you leave that out, I'm happy to add it later. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Prettier package not actually being cached 777677671 | |
| 753653260 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1169#issuecomment-753653260 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1169 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzY1MzI2MA== | simonw 9599 | 2021-01-03T17:54:40Z | 2021-01-03T17:54:40Z | OWNER | And @benpickles yes I would land that pull request straight away as-is. Thanks! |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Prettier package not actually being cached 777677671 | |
| 753653033 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1169#issuecomment-753653033 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1169 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzY1MzAzMw== | simonw 9599 | 2021-01-03T17:52:53Z | 2021-01-03T17:52:53Z | OWNER | Oh that's so frustrating! I was worried about that - I spotted a few runs that seemed faster and hoped that it meant that the package was coming out of the You've convinced me that Datasette itself should have a But... I'd really love to figure out a general pattern for using Any ideas? The best I can think of is for the workflow itself to write out a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Prettier package not actually being cached 777677671 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1