issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and "updated_at" is on date 2021-12-15 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

author_association 1

  • OWNER · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
995034911 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/262#issuecomment-995034911 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/262 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Twcf simonw 9599 2021-12-15T18:03:46Z 2021-12-15T18:03:56Z OWNER

This is relevant to the big refactor in: - #1518

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Add ?_extra= mechanism for requesting extra properties in JSON 323658641  
995034143 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-995034143 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47TwQf simonw 9599 2021-12-15T18:02:53Z 2021-12-15T18:02:53Z OWNER

This is definitely a missing feature. The "different types of facet" stuff feels incomplete to me generally - this is one issue, but this one as well:

  • 625

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  
995023410 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1423#issuecomment-995023410 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1423 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Ttoy simonw 9599 2021-12-15T17:48:40Z 2021-12-15T17:48:40Z OWNER

You've caused me to rethink this feature - I no longer think there's value in only showing these numbers if ?_facet_size=max as opposed to all of the time. New issue coming up.

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 1,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Show count of facet values if ?_facet_size=max 962391325  
995022217 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1542#issuecomment-995022217 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1542 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47TtWJ simonw 9599 2021-12-15T17:47:07Z 2021-12-15T17:47:07Z OWNER

This does make sense to me. I've been hoping to significantly improve the way JavaScript plugins work - there are some notes on that here: - #983

Encouraging plugins such as datasette-cluster-map to emit events that can then be listened to by other plugins is a really interesting idea that I hadn't considered.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 feature request: order and dependency of plugins (that use js) 1072106103  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);