issue_comments
39 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and "updated_at" is on date 2022-10-25 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw 39
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1291243333 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291243333 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9s9F | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T23:25:13Z | 2022-10-25T23:25:13Z | OWNER | A |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Default API token authentication mechanism 1421552095 | |
1291234262 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291234262 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9qvW | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T23:11:23Z | 2022-10-25T23:11:23Z | OWNER | I'm going to build an initial |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Default API token authentication mechanism 1421552095 | |
1291233652 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291233652 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9ql0 | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T23:10:20Z | 2022-10-25T23:10:44Z | OWNER | In which case the token would need to duplicate the current |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Default API token authentication mechanism 1421552095 | |
1291232589 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291232589 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9qVN | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T23:08:37Z | 2022-10-25T23:08:37Z | OWNER | ... so maybe there's a way to create a token that inherits the exact permissions of the actor that created the token? That could even be a default mode for tokens, with an option to then further restrict permissions if desired. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Default API token authentication mechanism 1421552095 | |
1291231651 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291231651 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9qGj | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T23:07:17Z | 2022-10-25T23:07:17Z | OWNER | Interesting challenge: what permissions should users be allowed to grant to tokens? Clearly a user should not be able to create a token with a permission that the user themselves does not have. And should there be a permission that allows people to create tokens? I think so. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Default API token authentication mechanism 1421552095 | |
1291227942 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291227942 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9pMm | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T23:01:18Z | 2022-10-25T23:01:18Z | OWNER | Datasette currently defaults to having everything public-readable by default, unless a permission plugin changes that default. In thinking more about this API mechanism, I realized that it might be good to have a mode where Datasette doesn't default to public everything. Maybe Might even be an opportunity to get rid of the current slightly confusing mechanism where permission checks can announce that they should default to true: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Default API token authentication mechanism 1421552095 | |
1291226367 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1291226367 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9oz_ | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T22:58:30Z | 2022-10-25T22:58:30Z | OWNER | The I think this API mechanism is going to be a bit less exciting than that - it will be low-level for inserting rows, and if you want to do something fancier you can use a canned query that feeds incoming GeoJSON to a SpatiaLite function instead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
API to insert a single record into an existing table 1421544654 | |
1291216193 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/505#issuecomment-1291216193 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/505 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9mVB | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T22:41:16Z | 2022-10-25T22:41:16Z | OWNER | Tweeted about it here: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1585038766678609921 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release sqlite-utils 3.30 1423182778 | |
1291203911 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/505#issuecomment-1291203911 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/505 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9jVH | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T22:21:02Z | 2022-10-25T22:21:02Z | OWNER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release sqlite-utils 3.30 1423182778 | |
1291170072 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/496#issuecomment-1291170072 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/496 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9bEY | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:36:12Z | 2022-10-25T21:36:12Z | OWNER | I was going to suggest using I could change |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
devrel/python api: Pylance type hinting 1393202060 | |
1291167887 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/496#issuecomment-1291167887 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/496 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9aiP | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:33:25Z | 2022-10-25T21:33:25Z | OWNER | I do care about this, but I'm not hugely experienced with types yet so I'm open to suggestions about how to do it! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
devrel/python api: Pylance type hinting 1393202060 | |
1291166273 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/493#issuecomment-1291166273 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/493 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9aJB | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:31:15Z | 2022-10-25T21:31:15Z | OWNER | Based on the docs here I tried the following too: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/smartquotes.html#description
But none of them had the desired effect in this particular piece of markup:
I think because this is text inside a Consider the following:
It's rendered like this: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Tiny typographical error in install/uninstall docs 1386562662 | |
1291159549 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/495#issuecomment-1291159549 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/495 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9Yf9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:23:01Z | 2022-10-25T21:23:01Z | OWNER | I've decided not to explicitly document this, since it's consistent with how other parts of the library work already. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support JSON values returned from .convert() functions 1392690202 | |
1291152433 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/495#issuecomment-1291152433 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/495 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9Wwx | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:14:54Z | 2022-10-25T21:14:54Z | OWNER | There is a case where the function can return a dictionary at the moment:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support JSON values returned from .convert() functions 1392690202 | |
1291149509 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/495#issuecomment-1291149509 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/495 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9WDF | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:12:11Z | 2022-10-25T21:12:11Z | OWNER | This makes sense to me. There are other places in the codebase where JSON is automatically stringified: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/c7e4308e6f49d929704163531632e558f9646e4a/sqlite_utils/db.py#L2759-L2766 I don't see why the return value from a convert function shouldn't do the same thing. Since this will result in previous errors working, I don't think it warrants a major version bump either. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support JSON values returned from .convert() functions 1392690202 | |
1291146850 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/497#issuecomment-1291146850 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/497 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9VZi | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:09:28Z | 2022-10-25T21:09:28Z | OWNER | Yeah, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
column_names 1393212964 | |
1291136971 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/504#issuecomment-1291136971 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/504 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9S_L | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T21:00:29Z | 2022-10-25T21:00:29Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
db.close() method, calling db.conn.close() 1423069384 | ||
1291124413 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291124413 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9P69 | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:47:34Z | 2022-10-25T20:47:34Z | OWNER | TIL about this: https://til.simonwillison.net/python/os-remove-windows |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291122389 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291122389 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9PbV | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:45:43Z | 2022-10-25T20:45:43Z | OWNER | That fixed it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291115986 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291115986 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9N3S | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:39:24Z | 2022-10-25T20:39:24Z | OWNER | Used
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291111357 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291111357 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9Mu9 | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:36:06Z | 2022-10-25T20:36:06Z | OWNER | ... or maybe Windows doesn't like attempts to remove a file that the process has opened? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291103021 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291103021 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9Kst | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:32:01Z | 2022-10-25T20:32:01Z | OWNER | This test reliably fails on Windows with Python 3.11. I'm going to skip the test for the moment to get back to green CI... but I'll leave this issue open. This is definitely concerning, I just don't have the right local environment to solve this at the moment. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291093581 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291093581 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9IZN | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:23:00Z | 2022-10-25T20:23:00Z | OWNER | I'm not hugely happy with my fix there: The problem here was that in the case where the So now I catch the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291088108 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291088108 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9HDs | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:17:36Z | 2022-10-25T20:17:36Z | OWNER | Now
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291083188 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291083188 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9F20 | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:12:52Z | 2022-10-25T20:12:52Z | OWNER | Failed again, but just noticed this: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/actions/runs/3323932266/jobs/5494890223 ```
tests\test_recreate.py:31: self = <[AttributeError("'Database' object has no attribute 'conn'") raised in repr()] Database object at 0x29fc125aa90> ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291076031 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291076031 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9EG_ | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:06:28Z | 2022-10-25T20:06:28Z | OWNER | This is the failing test: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/7b2d1c0ffd0b874e280292b926f328a61cb31e2c/tests/test_recreate.py#L21-L32 I'm going to try a different way of creating the temporary file: https://docs.pytest.org/en/7.1.x/how-to/tmp_path.html |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291071627 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503#issuecomment-1291071627 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/503 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M9DCL | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T20:02:18Z | 2022-10-25T20:02:18Z | OWNER | Passes on Windows with other Python versions for some reason. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_recreate failing on Windows Python 3.11 1423000702 | |
1291047214 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1854#issuecomment-1291047214 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1854 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M89Eu | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:39:36Z | 2022-10-25T19:39:48Z | OWNER | This pattern should work (for the http server at least):
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Flaky test: test_serve_localhost_http 1422973111 | |
1291046958 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1854#issuecomment-1291046958 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1854 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M89Au | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:39:22Z | 2022-10-25T19:39:22Z | OWNER | Here's the code that starts those various servers: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/613ad05c095f92653221db267ef53d54d00cdfbb/tests/conftest.py#L104-L177 I don't like those |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Flaky test: test_serve_localhost_http 1422973111 | |
1291045997 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1854#issuecomment-1291045997 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1854 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M88xt | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:38:28Z | 2022-10-25T19:38:28Z | OWNER | Also: ``` @pytest.mark.serial @pytest.mark.skipif( not hasattr(socket, "AF_UNIX"), reason="Requires socket.AF_UNIX support" ) def test_serve_unix_domain_socket(ds_unix_domain_socket_server): _, uds = ds_unix_domain_socket_server transport = httpx.HTTPTransport(uds=uds) client = httpx.Client(transport=transport)
/home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_cli_serve_server.py:35: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:1039: in get return self.request( /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:815: in request return self.send(request, auth=auth, follow_redirects=follow_redirects) /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:902: in send response = self._send_handling_auth( /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:930: in _send_handling_auth response = self._send_handling_redirects( /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:967: in _send_handling_redirects response = self._send_single_request(request) /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:1003: in _send_single_request response = transport.handle_request(request) /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/site-packages/httpx/_transports/default.py:217: in handle_request with map_httpcore_exceptions(): /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.8/x64/lib/python3.10/contextlib.py:153: in exit self.gen.throw(typ, value, traceback)
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Flaky test: test_serve_localhost_http 1422973111 | |
1291036623 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1853#issuecomment-1291036623 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M86fP | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:28:56Z | 2022-10-25T19:28:56Z | OWNER | Opened an issue here: - https://github.com/coleifer/pysqlite3/issues/43 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 1422915587 | |
1291032289 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1853#issuecomment-1291032289 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M85bh | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:24:27Z | 2022-10-25T19:24:27Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/-/versions now shows 3.11. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 1422915587 | |
1291029761 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/502#issuecomment-1291029761 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/502 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5M840B | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:21:44Z | 2022-10-25T19:21:44Z | OWNER | Replicated locally using a fresh virtual environment with Python 3.11 and:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix tests for Python 3.11 1422954582 | |
1291023926 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1853#issuecomment-1291023926 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M83Y2 | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:15:49Z | 2022-10-25T19:15:49Z | OWNER | This broke the deploy of I started using that for the Those were added in SQLite 3.31.0 - and the SQLite version in the new base image is 3.34.1 - so I don't actually need |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 1422915587 | |
1291012637 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1853#issuecomment-1291012637 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M80od | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:04:03Z | 2022-10-25T19:04:09Z | OWNER | And tested
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 1422915587 | |
1291009987 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1853#issuecomment-1291009987 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M8z_D | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T19:01:23Z | 2022-10-25T19:01:23Z | OWNER | Also tested by running this locally:
https://issue-1853-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/-/versions now shows Python 3.11.0. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 1422915587 | |
1291006149 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1853#issuecomment-1291006149 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M8zDF | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T18:57:33Z | 2022-10-25T18:57:33Z | OWNER | Ran the upgrade on the Datasette Cloud image first, works fine there. https://simon.datasette.cloud/-/versions shows me:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 1422915587 | |
1290995178 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1853#issuecomment-1290995178 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M8wXq | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T18:46:33Z | 2022-10-25T18:46:33Z | OWNER | I ran a very crude benchmark on my laptop using Locust (against the official macOS packages from www.python.org for Python 3.10 and Python 3.11) and saw a substantial speed increase: 533.89 requests/second on 3.11 413.56 requests/second on 3.10 That was from running Locust against this class CounterOne(HttpUser): @task def hello(self): self.client.get("/-/static/app.css") ``` Using:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 1422915587 | |
1289865317 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1289865317 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M4chl | simonw 9599 | 2022-10-25T01:42:47Z | 2022-10-25T01:42:47Z | OWNER | This is going to tie into Datasette's existing permissions mechanism, so plugins will be able to define their own custom mechanisms for tokens to be attached to a specific identity: https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/authentication.html There's only one plugin for API tokens at the moment, which is this one: https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-auth-tokens I'm actually planning on adding another, default token mechanism to Datasette itself as part of this work:
It may well be that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
API to insert a single record into an existing table 1421544654 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 12