issue_comments
1 row where body = "> Ugh, one disadvantage I just spotted with this: Datasette already has a `/-/versions.json` convention where "system" URLs are namespaced under `/-/` - but that could be confused under this new scheme with the `-/` escaping sequence. > > And I've thought about adding `/db/-/special` and `/db/table/-/special` URLs in the past too. I don't think this matters. The new regex does indeed capture that kind of page: <img width="1052" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/154752309-e1787755-3bdb-47c2-867c-7ac5fe65664d.png"> But Datasette goes through configured route regular expressions in order - so I can have the regex that captures `/db/-/special` routes listed before the one that captures tables and formats." sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1045095348 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045095348 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SuO0 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:53:48Z | 2022-02-18T19:53:48Z | OWNER |
I don't think this matters. The new regex does indeed capture that kind of page: But Datasette goes through configured route regular expressions in order - so I can have the regex that captures |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1