issue_comments
1 row where body = "@russss sorry I only just spotted your comment here. I think I have an alternative suggestion for what you need to do here. It sounds to me like you need to calculate a specific piece of information against a specific database. Instead of doing this in inspect, how about having a separate tool which runs this once against the database file and writes the result into a database file there? I've been thinking about this pattern a bit as part of the sqlite-utils work I've been doing. It's already something that's needed for SQLite FTS support - it's no good just creating a FTS index, you have to populate it as well. In sqlite-utils world you do that like this: https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cli.html#configuring-full-text-search $ sqlite-utils enable-fts mydb.db documents title summary But then later if you've inserted new records you have to call this: $ sqlite-utils populate-fts mydb.db documents title summary So one option here could be for `datasette-geo` to know to look for a special `datasette_geo_bounding_box` database table and, if it's missing, to calculate at runtime (probably once on startup and then cache it). Another option: Datasette now has an option to open a database file in "immutable" mode, using `datasette -i mydatabase.db`. When you do that we calculate counts on startup - and we'll also be able to load counts from the `inspect-data.json` file (that's pretty much all that will be in there). I'm open to making this available as a plugin hook - all kinds of optimizations could be run against these `-i` databases. It would essentially be what we have with inspect today but just for databases opened in that specific mode." sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
492903398 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/419#issuecomment-492903398 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/419 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5MjkwMzM5OA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-16T03:33:01Z | 2019-05-16T03:33:01Z | OWNER | @russss sorry I only just spotted your comment here. I think I have an alternative suggestion for what you need to do here. It sounds to me like you need to calculate a specific piece of information against a specific database. Instead of doing this in inspect, how about having a separate tool which runs this once against the database file and writes the result into a database file there? I've been thinking about this pattern a bit as part of the sqlite-utils work I've been doing. It's already something that's needed for SQLite FTS support - it's no good just creating a FTS index, you have to populate it as well. In sqlite-utils world you do that like this: https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cli.html#configuring-full-text-search
But then later if you've inserted new records you have to call this:
So one option here could be for Another option: Datasette now has an option to open a database file in "immutable" mode, using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Default to opening files in mutable mode, special option for immutable files 421551434 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1