issue_comments
2 rows where "created_at" is on date 2017-11-14, issue = 273127694 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Ship a Docker image of the whole thing · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
344185817 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/57#issuecomment-344185817 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/57 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NDE4NTgxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2017-11-14T08:46:24Z | 2017-11-14T08:46:24Z | OWNER | Thanks for the explanation! Please do start a pull request. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ship a Docker image of the whole thing 273127694 | |
344149165 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/57#issuecomment-344149165 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/57 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NDE0OTE2NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2017-11-14T05:16:34Z | 2017-11-14T05:17:14Z | OWNER | I’m intrigued by this pattern: https://github.com/macropin/datasette/blob/147195c2fdfa2b984d8f9fc1c6cab6634970a056/Dockerfile#L8 What’s the benefit of doing that? Does it result in a smaller image size? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ship a Docker image of the whole thing 273127694 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1