issue_comments
3 rows where "created_at" is on date 2018-04-14, reactions = "{"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0}" and user = 45057 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- russss · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
381361734 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/125#issuecomment-381361734 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/125 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4MTM2MTczNA== | russss 45057 | 2018-04-14T21:26:30Z | 2018-04-14T21:26:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | FWIW I am now doing this on my WTR app (instead of silently limiting maps to 1000). Telefonica now has about 4000 markers and good old BT has 22,000 or so. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plot rows on a map with Leaflet and Leaflet.markercluster 275135393 | |
381332222 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/205#issuecomment-381332222 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4MTMzMjIyMg== | russss 45057 | 2018-04-14T14:16:35Z | 2018-04-14T14:16:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've added some tests and that docs link. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support filtering with units and more 314319372 | |
381315675 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/203#issuecomment-381315675 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/203 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4MTMxNTY3NQ== | russss 45057 | 2018-04-14T09:14:45Z | 2018-04-14T09:27:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
<s>From a machine-readable perspective I'm not sure why it would be useful to decorate the values with units</s>. Edit: Should have had some coffee first. It's clearly useful for stuff like map rendering! I agree that the unit metadata should definitely be exposed in the JSON.
I'm thinking about a couple of approaches here. I think the simplest one is: if the column has a unit attached, optionally accept units in query fields: ```python column_units = ureg("Hz") # Create a unit object for the column's unit query_variable = ureg("4 GHz") # Supplied query variable Now we can convert the query units into column units before queryingsupplied_value.to(column_units).magnitude
If the user doesn't supply units, pint just returns the plainnumber and we can query as usual assuming it's the base unitquery_variable = ureg("50") query_variable
isinstance(query_variable, numbers.Number)
This also lets us do some nice unit conversion on querying: ```python column_units = ureg("m") query_variable = ureg("50 ft") supplied_value.to(column_units)
The alternative would be to provide a dropdown of units next to the query field (so a "Hz" field would give you "kHz", "MHz", "GHz"). Although this would be clearer to the user, it isn't so easy - we'd need to know more about the context of the field to give you sensible SI prefixes (I'm not so interested in nanoHertz, for example). You also lose the bonus of being able to convert - although pint will happily show you all the compatible units, it again suffers from a lack of context: ```python ureg("m").compatible_units()
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for units 313837303 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3