issue_comments
11 rows where "created_at" is on date 2020-04-16 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw · 11 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 614843406 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/27#issuecomment-614843406 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/27 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDg0MzQwNg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T19:11:53Z | 2020-04-16T19:20:23Z | MEMBER | This didn't quite work: the column type is incorrect, so the foreign key relationship isn't sticking: https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/repos?organization=53015001
The problem is that if the first repo inserted has no organization it's set to One solution would be to create the column explicitly with a type, but this could get messy. I think I want a new sqlite-utils feature for this instead. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Repos have a big blob of JSON in the organization column 601330277 | |
| 614846059 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/100#issuecomment-614846059 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/100 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDg0NjA1OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T19:17:56Z | 2020-04-16T19:17:56Z | OWNER | Reminder: the current list of arguments for those methods is: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/13528faa817d79bc3900d3af7473300686b145d7/sqlite_utils/db.py#L951-L967 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Mechanism for forcing column-type, over-riding auto-detection 601358649 | |
| 614845657 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/100#issuecomment-614845657 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/100 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDg0NTY1Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T19:17:05Z | 2020-04-16T19:17:05Z | OWNER | The syntax for explicitly creating a table looks like this:
I think it becomes a new optional argument to Options:
I like the first two best. I'm leaning towards Maybe something like this:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Mechanism for forcing column-type, over-riding auto-detection 601358649 | |
| 614831842 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/27#issuecomment-614831842 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/27 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDgzMTg0Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T18:48:18Z | 2020-04-16T18:48:18Z | MEMBER | I'm going to make |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Repos have a big blob of JSON in the organization column 601330277 | |
| 614831451 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/27#issuecomment-614831451 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/27 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDgzMTQ1MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T18:47:25Z | 2020-04-16T18:47:25Z | MEMBER | Is it possible for a repo to have an |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Repos have a big blob of JSON in the organization column 601330277 | |
| 614810417 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/25#issuecomment-614810417 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/25 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDgxMDQxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T18:07:11Z | 2020-04-16T18:07:11Z | MEMBER | Turns out the main problem was #26 - now fixed. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Improvements to demo instance 601265023 | |
| 614795712 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/26#issuecomment-614795712 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDc5NTcxMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T17:40:27Z | 2020-04-16T17:40:27Z | MEMBER | Aha! it was missing from the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Topics are missing from repositories 601271612 | |
| 614794739 | https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/26#issuecomment-614794739 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDc5NDczOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T17:38:28Z | 2020-04-16T17:38:28Z | MEMBER | {
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Topics are missing from repositories 601271612 | ||
| 614400533 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/76#issuecomment-614400533 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/76 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDQwMDUzMw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T03:51:26Z | 2020-04-16T03:51:26Z | OWNER | Documentation here: https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/stable/python-api.html#listing-rows |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
order_by mechanism 549287310 | |
| 614400454 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/76#issuecomment-614400454 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/76 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDQwMDQ1NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T03:51:01Z | 2020-04-16T03:51:01Z | OWNER | Released in 2.6 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
order_by mechanism 549287310 | |
| 614354219 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/76#issuecomment-614354219 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/76 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNDM1NDIxOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-16T01:01:34Z | 2020-04-16T01:01:34Z | OWNER | I think a neat way to do this would be with an optional argument for
If you want everything you can use this:
It's a tiny bit weird calling |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
order_by mechanism 549287310 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 5