issue_comments
6 rows where "created_at" is on date 2020-06-09, issue = 632753851 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Release Datasette 0.44 · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
641637696 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/806#issuecomment-641637696 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/806 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MTYzNzY5Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-09T23:46:00Z | 2020-06-09T23:46:00Z | OWNER | The issues that should be referenced from this release are: 395, #519, #576, #699, #706, #774, #777, #781, #784, #788, #790, #797, #798, #800, #802, #804, #819, #822 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release Datasette 0.44 632753851 | |
641634749 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/806#issuecomment-641634749 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/806 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MTYzNDc0OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-09T23:34:52Z | 2020-06-09T23:34:52Z | OWNER | Preview of the release notes is now available here: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html#v0-44 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release Datasette 0.44 632753851 | |
641604210 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/806#issuecomment-641604210 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/806 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MTYwNDIxMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-09T21:59:33Z | 2020-06-09T22:00:11Z | OWNER | AWS IAM uses action and resource terminology: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/introduction_access-management.html - I think that's where I got that language:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release Datasette 0.44 632753851 | |
641603457 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/806#issuecomment-641603457 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/806 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MTYwMzQ1Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-09T21:57:32Z | 2020-06-09T21:57:32Z | OWNER | operation, procedure, process as alternative words for those menu items? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release Datasette 0.44 632753851 | |
641602794 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/806#issuecomment-641602794 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/806 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MTYwMjc5NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-09T21:55:45Z | 2020-06-09T21:55:45Z | OWNER | Last-minute thought: Should I worry about calling permissions "actions", when I have an idea for a future plugin hook that allows plugins to add something I was going to call "actions" to database, table and row pages? Those actions would take the form of menu item commands that Do Something to the selected object. If I use "actions" to mean permission names, will I be able to find a good alternative name for these dynamic menu items? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release Datasette 0.44 632753851 | |
641026726 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/806#issuecomment-641026726 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/806 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MTAyNjcyNg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-09T04:52:07Z | 2020-06-09T04:52:07Z | OWNER | Changelog for this is going to be huge - 96 commits since 0.43 already! https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/0.43...master |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Release Datasette 0.44 632753851 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1