issue_comments
4 rows where "created_at" is on date 2023-09-03 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw 4
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1704387161 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/590#issuecomment-1704387161 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/590 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5lluJZ | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-03T19:50:36Z | 2023-09-03T19:50:36Z | OWNER | Maybe just populate |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Ability to tell if a Database is an in-memory one 1879214365 | |
| 1704384393 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589#issuecomment-1704384393 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5llteJ | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-03T19:36:34Z | 2023-09-03T19:36:34Z | OWNER | Here's a prototype: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/commit/62f673835c4a66f87cf6f949eaff43c8b014619b Still needs tests and documentation (and some more thought to make sure it's doing the right thing). |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Mechanism for de-registering registered SQL functions 1879209560 | |
| 1704384111 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589#issuecomment-1704384111 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5lltZv | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-03T19:35:03Z | 2023-09-03T19:35:03Z | OWNER | Normally in Python/ You can't do that with |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Mechanism for de-registering registered SQL functions 1879209560 | |
| 1704383901 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589#issuecomment-1704383901 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5lltWd | simonw 9599 | 2023-09-03T19:34:05Z | 2023-09-03T19:34:05Z | OWNER | For that particular case I realized I'd quite like to have a mechanism for applying functions for a block of code and then de-registering them at the end - a context manager. I played with this idea a bit:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Mechanism for de-registering registered SQL functions 1879209560 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 2