issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where issue = 1083246400 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • simonw · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • Update janus requirement from <0.8,>=0.6.2 to >=0.6.2,<1.1 · 3 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
997082189 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1562#issuecomment-997082189 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1562 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bkRN simonw 9599 2021-12-17T23:08:14Z 2021-12-17T23:08:14Z OWNER

Oh that makes sense: In Python 3.6 this happens: Collecting janus<1.1,>=0.6.2 Using cached janus-0.7.0-py3-none-any.whl (6.9 kB) While in Python 3.7 or higher this happens: Collecting janus<1.1,>=0.6.2 Downloading janus-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl (6.9 kB) So this is safe to apply because pip is smart enough to pick the version of Janus that works for that Python version.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Update janus requirement from <0.8,>=0.6.2 to >=0.6.2,<1.1 1083246400  
997081673 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1562#issuecomment-997081673 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1562 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bkJJ simonw 9599 2021-12-17T23:06:38Z 2021-12-17T23:06:38Z OWNER

From this diff between 0.7.0 and 1.0: https://github.com/aio-libs/janus/compare/v0.7.0...v1.0.0

It looks like the only change relevant to compatibility is loop = asyncio.get_running_loop() directly instead of falling back to asyncio.get_event_loop() if get_running_loop isn't available.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Update janus requirement from <0.8,>=0.6.2 to >=0.6.2,<1.1 1083246400  
997080352 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1562#issuecomment-997080352 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1562 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bj0g simonw 9599 2021-12-17T23:03:08Z 2021-12-17T23:03:08Z OWNER

They say they've dropped 3.6 support, but Datasette's tests against 3.6 are still passing.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Update janus requirement from <0.8,>=0.6.2 to >=0.6.2,<1.1 1083246400  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);