issue_comments
10 rows where issue = 1096563265 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Python library methods for calling ANALYZE · 10 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1009508865 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009508865 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48K-IB | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-11T01:08:51Z | 2022-01-11T01:08:51Z | OWNER | The Python methods are all done now, next step is the CLI options. I'll do those in a separate issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009288898 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009288898 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KIbC | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:54:04Z | 2022-01-10T19:54:04Z | OWNER | Having browsed the API reference I think the methods that would benefit from an
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009285627 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009285627 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KHn7 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:49:19Z | 2022-01-10T19:51:25Z | OWNER | Documentation for those two new methods: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/python-api.html#optimizing-index-usage-with-analyze |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009286373 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009286373 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KHzl | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:50:22Z | 2022-01-10T19:50:22Z | OWNER | With respect to #365, I'm now thinking that having the ability to say "... and then run ANALYZE" could be useful for a bunch of Python methods. For example:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1009273525 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1009273525 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48KEq1 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-10T19:32:39Z | 2022-01-10T19:32:39Z | OWNER | I'm going to implement the Python library methods based on the prototype: ```diff commit 650f97a08f29a688c530e5f6c9eedc9269ed7bdc Author: Simon Willison swillison@gmail.com Date: Sat Jan 8 13:34:01 2022 -0800
diff --git a/sqlite_utils/db.py b/sqlite_utils/db.py
index dfc4723..1348b4a 100644
--- a/sqlite_utils/db.py
+++ b/sqlite_utils/db.py
@@ -923,6 +923,13 @@ class Database:
"Run a SQLite
class Queryable: def exists(self) -> bool: @@ -2902,6 +2909,10 @@ class Table(Queryable): ) return self
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1008158616 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1008158616 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F0eY | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-08T21:35:32Z | 2022-01-08T21:35:32Z | OWNER | Built a prototype in a branch, see #367. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1008157132 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1008157132 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48F0HM | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-08T21:23:08Z | 2022-01-08T21:25:05Z | OWNER | Running This should be added to the default list of hidden tables in Datasette. It looks something like this: | tbl | idx | stat | |---------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------| | _counts | sqlite_autoindex__counts_1 | 5 1 | | global-power-plants_fts_config | global-power-plants_fts_config | 1 1 | | global-power-plants_fts_docsize | | 33643 | | global-power-plants_fts_idx | global-power-plants_fts_idx | 199 40 1 | | global-power-plants_fts_data | | 136 | | global-power-plants | "global-power-plants_owner" | 33643 4 | | global-power-plants | "global-power-plants_country_long" | 33643 202 |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1007641634 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1007641634 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48D2Qi | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-07T18:35:35Z | 2022-01-07T18:35:35Z | OWNER | Since the existing CLI feature is this:
I can add |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1007639860 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1007639860 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48D100 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-07T18:32:59Z | 2022-01-07T18:33:07Z | OWNER | From the SQLite docs:
So I think this becomes two methods:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 | |
1007637963 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366#issuecomment-1007637963 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/366 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM48D1XL | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-07T18:30:13Z | 2022-01-07T18:30:13Z | OWNER | Annoyingly I use the word "analyze" to mean something else in the CLI - for these features:
there's only one method with a similar name in the Python library though and that's this one: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Python library methods for calling ANALYZE 1096563265 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1